Development of students’ subjectivity through interaction with generative artificial intelligence: a systematic review of scientific concepts

Introduction. The educational activities of students are currently undergoing significant changes due to the active integration of generative artificial intelligence into the learning process. The academic community is concerned that these technologies may not only diminish students’ cognitive abilities but also undermine their role as active participants in educational activities. Consequently, it is important to develop a model of interaction between students and generative artificial intelligence that supports the preservation and enhancement of their agency. This approach will enable the management of the currently spontaneous interactions between students and neural networks, making the process purposeful, controlled, and focused on the personal development of students. Aim. The present study aimed to conduct a systematic analysis of scientific perspectives on student subjectivity and its interaction with generative artificial intelligence. Methodology and research methods. The aim was achieved through the following methods: analytical literature review and systems analysis. Results. It was established that the theoretical basis for developing a model of developmental interaction between students and generative artificial intelligence comprised the fundamental characteristics of interaction as an interdisciplinary category, alongside the qualities of the subject related to autonomy, awareness, and the ability to self-regulate and self-organise activities. Scientific novelty. The interaction of students with generative artificial intelligence is regarded not only as a means to enhance educational outcomes but, above all, as an opportunity to develop the student’s personal qualities. Practical significance. The materials presented in this article may be utilised by practitioners in the fields of pedagogy and educational psychology to develop programmes for the psychological and pedagogical support of students. Furthermore, a theoretical review and systematic analysis of the scientific literature on the concepts of interaction and subjectivity can be beneficial for conducting psychological research and teaching psychology courses.

1. Soldatova G.U., Rasskazova E.I., Nestik T.A. Cifrovoe pokolenie Rossii: kompetentnost’ i bezopasnost’ = The Digital Generation of Russia: Competence and Security. Moscow: Publishing House Smysl; 2017. 375 p. (In Russ.). Accessed January 05, 2025. https://lyl.su/azMe

2. VanDeventer S.S., White J.A. Expert behavior in children’s video game play. Simulation & Gaming. 2002;33(1):28–48. doi:10.1177/1046878102033001002

3. Tarpley T. Children, the Internet, and other new technologies. In: Singer D., Singer J., eds. Handbook of Children and the Media. Thousands Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2001:547–556. Accessed January 14, 2025. https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780761919544

4. Rosen L.D., Lim A.F., Felt J., Carrier L.M., Cheever N.A., Lara-Ruiz J.M. Media and technology use predicts ill-being among children, preteens and teenagers independent of the negative health impacts of exercise and eating habits. Computers in Human Behavior. 2014;35:364–375. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.036

5. Lim W.M., Gunasekara A., Pallant J.L., Pallant J.I., Pechenkina E. Generative AI and the future of education: ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education. 2023;21(2):100790. doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790

6. Razmerita L. Human-AI collaboration: a student-centered perspective of generative AI use in higher education. In: Proceedings of the 23rd European Conference on e-Learning – ECEL 2024. 2024:320– 329. doi:10.34190/ecel.23.1.3008

7. Erciyas Ş.K., Ekrem E.C., Edis E.K. Relationship between individual innovativeness levels and attitudes toward artificial intelligence among nursing and midwifery students. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 2024;42(11):802–808. doi:10.1097/CIN.0000000000001170

8. Salem G.M.M., El-Gazar H.E., Mahdy A.Ya., Alharbi T.A.F., Zoromba M.A. Nursing students’ personality traits and their attitude toward artificial intelligence: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Journal of Nursing Management. 2024;1:1–10. doi:10.1155/2024/6992824

9. Rodríguez-Ruiz J., Marín-López I., Espejo-Siles R. Is artificial intelligence use related to self-control, self-esteem and self-efficacy among university students? Education and Information Technologies. 2025;30(2):2507–2524. doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12906-6

10. Jun H., Wenhao Ya., Ali N., Khan A.B. The model of improving college students’ critical thinking ability based on artificial intelligence. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 2024;14(6):478–492. doi:10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i6/21686

11. Rusandi M.A., Ahman, Saripah I., Khairun D.Y., Mutmainnah. No worries with ChatGPT: building bridges between AI and education with critical thinking soft skills. Journal of Public Health. 2023;45(3):602–603. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdad049

12. Qawqzeh Y. Exploring the influence of student interaction with ChatGPT on critical thinking, problem solving, and creativity. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 2024;14(4):596–601. doi:10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.4.2082

13. Baidoo-Anu D., Owusu Ansah L. Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI. 2023;7(1):52–62. doi:10.61969/jai.1337500

14. Klos M.C., Escoredo M., Joerin A., Lemos V.N., Rauws M., Bunge E.L. Artificial intelligence-based chatbot for anxiety and depression in university students: pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Formative Research. 2020;5(8):1–28. doi:10.2196/20678

15. Liu J. ChatGPT: perspectives from human-computer interaction and psychology. Frontiers of Artificial Intelligence. 2024;7. Accessed June 01, 2025. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/artificial-intelligence/articles/10.3389/frai.2024.1418869/full

16. Lai T., Xie C., Ruan M., Wang Z., Lu H., Fu S. Influence of artificial intelligence in education on adolescents’ social adaptability: the mediatory role of social support. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(3):e0283170. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0283170

17. Tamimi J., Addichane E., Alaoui S.M. Evaluating the effects of artificial intelligence homework assistance tools on high school students’ academic performance and personal development. Arab World English Journal. 2024;10:36–42. doi:10.24093/awej/call10.3

18. Bozkurt A., Xiao J., Farrow R., Bai J.Y.H., Nerantzi C., Mooreet S., et al. The manifesto for teaching and learning in a time of generative AI: a critical collective stance to better navigate the future. Open Praxis. 2024;16(4):487–513. doi:10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.777

19. Panov V.I. Ecopsychological prerequisites for the study of mental activity. Izvestija Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaja serija. Serija “Akmeologija obrazovanija”. Psihologija razvitija = Proceedings of the Saratov University. A New Series. Series “Acmeology of Education”. Psychology of Development. 2014;3(3):214–224. (In Russ.) Accessed March 25, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ekopsihologicheskie-predposylki-izucheniya-psihicheskoy-aktivnosti?ysclid=mex6xnnte8752145026

20. Startsev M.V. The category of “Interaction” in philosophical, sociological, psychological and pedagogical literature. Psihologo-pedagogicheskij zhurnal Gaudeamus = The Psychological and Pedagogical Journal Gaudeamus. 2007;1(11):49–61. (In Russ.) Accessed March 27, 2025. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15016526&ysclid=mex703rg90613502602

21. Korotaeva E.V. Osnovy pedagogiki vzaimodejstvij: teorija i praktika = Fundamentals of Interaction Pedagogy: Theory and Practice. Ekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University; 2013. 203 p. (In Russ.) Accessed March 27, 2025. https://lyl.su/dlS5

22. Basov O.O., Karpov A.A., Saitov I.A. Metodologicheskie osnovy sinteza polimodal’nyh infokommunikacionnyh sistem gosudarstvennogo upravlenija = Methodological Foundations of the Synthesis of Polymodal Information and Communication Systems of Public Administration. Orel: Academy of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation; 2015. 271 p. (In Russ.) Accessed March 14, 2025. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23701220&ysclid=mex75j6xsv413944579

23. Steshina L.A., Petukhov I.V. The concept of human-oriented design of complex technical systems. Sovremennye naukoemkie tehnologii = Modern High-Tech Technologies. 2023;7:92–96. (In Russ.) doi:10.17513/snt.39700

24. Minitaeva A.M. Organization of the human-machine interface, taking into account the intellectualization of human interaction and the computing complex. Programmnye produkty i sistemy = Software Products and Systems. 2013;3:104–107. (In Russ.) Accessed April 02, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/organizatsiya-cheloveko-mashinnogo-interfeysa-s-uchetom-intellektualizatsii-vzaimodeystviya-cheloveka-i-vychislitelnogo-kompleksa?ysclid=mex7a930ng911889201

25. Karpov A.A., Yusupov R.M. Multimodal interfaces of human-machine interaction. Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk = Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2018;88(2):146–155. (In Russ.) doi:10.7868/S0869587318020056

26. Wilson J., Daugherty P.R. Collaborative intelligence: humans and AI are joining forces. Harvard Business Review. 2018;96(4):114–123. Accessed April 05, 2025. https://www.iveypublishing.ca/s/product/collaborative-intelligence-humans-and-ai-are-joining-forces/01t5c00000Cwo5gAAB

27. Dave D.M., Mandvikar S. Augmented intelligence: human-AI collaboration in the era of digital transformation. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology. 2023;8(6):24– 33. doi:10.33564/IJEAST.2023.v08i06.003

28. Ji H., Han I., Ko Y. A systematic review of conversational AI in language education: focusing on the collaboration with human teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 2023;55(1):48– 63. doi:10.1080/15391523.2022.2142873

29. Sharma A., Lin I.W., Miner A.S., Atkins D.C., Althoff T. Human-AI collaboration enables more empathic conversations in text-based peer-to-peer mental health support. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2023;5(1):46–57. doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00593-2

30. Ifenthaler D., Schumacher C. Reciprocal issues of artificial and human intelligence in education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 2023;55(1):1–6. doi:10.1080/15391523.2022.2154511

31. Jiang T., Sun Z., Fu S., Lv. Y. Human-AI interaction research agenda: a user-centered perspective. Data and Information Management. 2024;8(4):100078. doi:10.1016/j.dim.2024.100078

32. Lindgren H. Emerging roles and relationships among humans and interactive AI systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2024;41(17):10595–10617. doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2435693

33. Kim J., Lee H., Cho Y.H. Learning design to support student-AI collaboration: perspectives of leading teachers for AI in education. Education and Information Technologies. 2022;27:6069–6104. doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10831-6

34. Yan W., Nakajima T., Sawada R. Benefits and challenges of collaboration between students and conversational generative artificial intelligence in programming learning: an empirical case study. Education Sciences. 2024;14(4):433. doi:10.3390/educsci14040433

35. Atchley P., Pannell H., Wofford K., Hopkins M., Atchley R.A. Human and AI collaboration in the higher education environment: opportunities and concerns. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. 2024;9:20–31. doi:10.1186/s41235-024-00547-9

36. Selezneva M.V. Comparative analysis of the concepts of “subject” and “subjectivity” in foreign psychology. Vestnik RUDN. Ser. Psihologija i pedagogika = Bulletin of the RUDN University. Series Psychology and Pedagogy. 2015;2:47–53. (In Russ.) Accessed May 06, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sravnitelnyy-analiz-ponyatiy-subekt-i-subektnost-v-zarubezhnoy-psihologii?ysclid=mex7mmb8jn513507085

37. Dattathrani S., De’ R. The concept of agency in the era of artificial intelligence: dimensions and degrees. Information Systems Frontiers. 2023;25(1):29–54. doi:10.1007/s10796-022-10336-8

38. Madary M. The illusion of agency in human – computer interaction. Neuroethics. 2022;15(1):16. doi:10.1007/s12152-022-09491-1

39. Khisambeev Sh.R. The problem of subjectivity in philosophy and psychology. Psihologicheskie issledovanija = Psychological Research. 2015;8(39):6–15. doi:10.54359/ps.v8i39.569

40. Selivanov V. V. Svojstva sub’ekta i ego zhiznennyj cikl = Properties of the subject and its life cycle. In: Brushlinsky A.V., Volovikova M.I., eds. Psihologija individual’nogo i gruppovogo sub’ekta = Psychology of the Individual and Group Subject. Moscow: Publishing House PER SJe; 2002:310–329. (In Russ.) Accessed May 14, 2025. https://elibrary.ru/sijfhr?ysclid=mex80ohohe501303740

41. Sergienko E.A. Psihicheskoe razvitie s pozicij sistemno-sub’ektnogo podhoda = Mental Development from the Perspective of a Systemic-Subjective Approach. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2021. 393 p. (In Russ.) doi:10.38098/mng_21_0435

42. Pavlova N.S. The study of subjective and personal characteristics in line with the system-subjective approach. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psihologija = Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Psychology. 2023;13(4):462–474. (In Russ.) doi:10.21638/spbu16.2023.402

43. Abulkhanova K. A. Rubinshtejnovskaja kategorija sub’ekta i ee razlichnye metodologicheskie znachenija = Rubinstein’s category of the subject and its various methodological meanings. In: Brushlinsky A.V., Volovikova M.I., eds. Psihologija individual’nogo i gruppovogo sub’ekta = Psychology of the Individual and Group Subject. Moscow: Publishing House PER SJe; 2002:34–51. (In Russ.) Accessed May 14, 2025. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21780135&pff=1

44. Lepskiy V.E. Artificial intelligence in subjective management paradigm. Filosofskie nauki = Philosophical Sciences. 2021;64(1):88–101. (In Russ.) doi:10.30727/0235-1188-2021-64-1-88-101

45. Leontiev D.A. What gives psychology the concept of a subject: subjectivity as a dimension of personality. Jepistemologija i filosofija nauki = Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. 2010;15(3):136– 173. (In Russ.) Accessed May 09, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/chto-daet-psihologii-ponyatie-subekta-subektnost-kak-izmerenie-lichnosti?ysclid=mex8410egl277776735

46. Abulkhanova-Slavskaya K.A. Problema opredelenija sub’ekta v psihologii = The problem of defining a subject in psychology. In: Sayko E.V., ed. Sub’ekt dejstvija, vzaimodejstvija, poznanija: psihologicheskie, filosofskie, sociokul’turnye aspekty = The Subject of Action, Interaction, Cognition: Psychological, Philosophical, Sociocultural Aspects. Moscow: Voronezh; 2001:36–53. (In Russ.)

47. Lodde O.A. The main provisions of the subject-activity approach in the framework of the study of personality adaptability. Istoriko-kriticheskie obzory i sovremennye issledovanija = Psychology. Historical and Critical Reviews and Modern Research. 2019;8(4A):175–181. (In Russ.) doi:10.34670/AR.2019.44.4.021

48. Brushlinsky A.V. O kriterijah sub’ekta = On the criteria of the subject. In: Brushlinsky A.V., Volovikova M.I., eds. Psihologija individual’nogo i gruppovogo sub’ekta = Psychology of the Individual and Group Subject. Moscow: Publishing House PER SJe; 2002:9–33. (In Russ.) Accessed May 14, 2025. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21739451&pff=1&ysclid=mex8aw5cez581025330

49. Sergienko E.A. System-subjective approach: justification and perspective. Psihologicheskij zhurnal = Psychological Journal. 2011;32(1):120–132. (In Russ.) Accessed May 21, 2025. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16283464&ysclid=mex8d20vtg77546801

50. Kuznetsova M.D. Prospects for the development of low-parametric models of subjectivity in psychology. In: Bolotova A.K., ed. Perspektivnye napravlenija psihologicheskoj nauki = Promising Areas of Psychological Science. Issue 2. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics; 2012:204–230. (In Russ.) Accessed April 29, 2025. https://lyl.su/3lOX

51. Inden R. Imagining India. C. Hurst & Co. Publishers; 2000. 298 p. Accessed Febrary 03, 2025. https:// archive.org/details/imaginingindia0000inde/page/n7/mode/2up

52. Bandura A. Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2006;1(2):164–180. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x

53. Sorokin P.S. The problem of “agency” through the prism of the new reality: the state and directions of development. Sociologicheskie issledovanija = Sociological Research. 2023;3:103–114. (In Russ.) doi:10.31857/S013216250022927-2

54. Sorokin P.S., Koreshnikova Ju.N., et al. Samostojatel’nost’ i proaktivnoe povedenie = Independence and Proactive Behavior. Moscow: Higher School of Economics; 2022. 383 p. (In Russ.) Accessed April 02, 2025. https://lyl.su/qnTd

55. Klemencic M. From student engagement to student agency: conceptual considerations of European policies on student-centered learning in higher education. Higher Education Policy. 2017;30:69–85. doi:10.1057/s41307-016-0034-4

56. Sutterlüty F., Tisdall E.K.M. Agency, autonomy and self-determination: questioning key concepts of childhood studies. Global Studies of Childhood. 2019;9(3):183–187. doi:10.1177/2043610619860992