The innovative model for enhancing the research work of university students in the Republic of Kazakhstan within the context of technological sovereignty priorities

Introduction. The relevance of this study is underscored by the necessity to address the challenges of technological development in the Republic of Kazakhstan, as outlined in the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated 1 July 2024, No. 103-VIII ЗРК, “On Science and Technological Policy”. Aim. The present research aimed to develop an innovative model to enhance the research activities of students at higher education institutions in the Republic of Kazakhstan, based on the analysis and synthesis of both international and Kazakhstani experiences in organising scientific research within the context of achieving technological sovereignty. Methodology and research methods. The study employed theoretical methods, including the analysis of regulatory documents and literature related to the research problem, the generalisation of ideas concerning factors that activate research work, and the comparison of models for organising scientific research activities among students. Empirical methods used comprised observation, questionnaires, and the Delphi method. The respondents included 2,370 students enrolled in various educational programmes, 1,458 teachers, and 351 experts from nine leading universities in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Data processing and analysis were conducted using the SPSS software package. The official average statistical assessment of data in the Republic of Kazakhstan further reinforced the reliability of the results obtained in this comprehensive study. Results and scientific novelty. The article examines the pedagogical potential of comprehensive support for university students’ research activities within the context of the digital transformation of education. It establishes that the effectiveness of student research is largely determined by a combination of institutional mechanisms, digital tools, the level of methodological training, and the role of the teacher-mentor. The integration of research into the university’s strategic and educational frameworks is justified. An innovative model designed to enhance students’ motivation, research autonomy, and engagement has been developed and tested. The relationship between the development of digital and organisational infrastructure for student research activities and the formation of a sustainable research identity among students has been confirmed. Practical significance. The innovative model can serve as a tool for strategic and operational management in universities across various disciplines.

1. Bashirov A.V., Golovachѐva V.N., Nakipova G.E., Khanov T.A. Features of the implementation of research activities of students in universities of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Trudy universiteta = Proceedings of the University. 2023;3(92):378–393. (In Russ.) doi:10.52209/1609-1825_2023_387

2. Kochemasova L.A. Theoretical prerequisites for activating research activities as an innovative regulator for improving the quality of professional training of students. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2015;6. (In Russ.) Accessed February 15, 2025. https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=23108

3. Arsentyeva M.V. Features of research work of junior students. Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = News of Tula State University. 2017;11-2:208–210. (In Russ.) Accessed February 16, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-nauchno-issledovatelskoy-raboty-studentov-mladshih-kursov-obucheniya?ysclid=m7vpq4kqo5161749937

4. Vedeneyeva G.I., Baklanov I.O. On approaches to organizing students’ research activities. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2017;6. (In Russ.) Accessed April 14, 2025. https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=27118

5. Frolova T.N., Shashurina G.V. Systems approach and its role in scientific research. Psihologiya i pedagogika sluzhebnoj deyatel’nosti = Psychology and Pedagogy of Service Activities. 2023;1:158–161. doi:10.24412/2658-638X-2023-1-158-161

6. Mordovskaya A.V. Competence-based approach to organizing research work of bachelors. Nauka, obrazovanie, tekhnologii = Science, Education, Technology. 2012;2:14–19. (In Russ.) Accessed April 14, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kompetentnostnyy-podhod-k-organizatsii-nauchno-issledovatelskoy-podgotovki-bakalavrov?ysclid=m9h761fseq75347655

7. Bolshakova O.N. Conceptual model of the system of training university students for research activities. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya = Higher Education Today. 2014;10. (In Russ.) Accessed February 21, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kontseptualnaya-model-sistemy-podgotovki-studentov-vuza-k-nauchno-issledovatelskoy-deyatelnosti

8. Yakovleva-Chernysheva A.Yu., Druzhinina A.V., Alekseev V.P. Innovative approaches to the organization of scientific research activities of the university. Nauchno-metodicheskij ehlektronnyj zhurnal Koncept = Scientific and Methodological Electronic Journal Concept. 2015;4:16–20. (In Russ.) Accessed February 22, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/innovatsionnye-podhody-k-organizatsii-nauchno-issledovatelskoy-deyatelnosti-universiteta?ysclid=m7vqi5tkx041487462

9. Chuprova L.V. Organization of scientific research work of students in the context of reforming the system of higher professional education. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental’nykh issledovanij = International Journal of Applied and Basic Research. 2014;5-2:167–170. (In Russ.) Accessed February 25, 2025. https://applied-research.ru/ru/article/view?id=5362

10. Ivanova I.V., Lukyanova O.G. Mentoring and mentoring – trends in the development of research activities of students. Profil’naya shkola = Professional School. 2023;1(5):20–26. (In Russ.) Accessed February 25, 2025. https://naukaru.ru/ru/nauka/article/71360/view

11. Komarova I.V. New approaches to organizing students’ research work. Nauchnyj potencial = Scientific Potential. 2022;1(36):71–74. (In Russ.) Accessed February 25, 2025. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?edn=qfciqq&ysclid=m76ag6n6x4222173714

12. Korotkov S.G. Model of preparing students for research activities by means of pedagogical consulting. Vestnik Marijskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Mari State University. 2021;15(1):44–51. (In Russ.) doi:10.30914/2072-6783-2021-15-1-44-52

13. Danilova I.Yu. Mnogourovnevaja model’ organizacii nauchno-issledovatel’skoj raboty studentov kak sredstvo obespechenija kachestva obrazovanija v vuze = Multilevel Model of Organizing Students’ Research Work as a Means of Ensuring the Quality of Education in a University. Dissertation. Moscow; 2010. 172 p. (In Russ.)

14. Abraukhova V.V., Zimovets A.S., Getaova N.R., Khvostov A.G. Organization of students’ research work in the educational process of the university. Gumanitarnye nauki = Humanities. 2024;2:42– 48. (In Russ.) Accessed February 17, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/organizatsiya-nauchno-issledovatelskoy-raboty-studentov-v-obrazovatelnom-protsesse-vuza?ysclid=m7vq6rmmdi55371592

15. Stromov V.Yu., Sysoev P.V. Model of organization of scientific research activities of students in the university. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2017;10(216):75–82. (In Russ.) Accessed February 15, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/model-organizatsii-nauchno-issledovatelskoy-deyatelnosti-studentov-v-vuze?ysclid=m7vp0nvd7644787127

16. Maidangalieva Z.A., Idrisov S.N., Kuzembaeva G.A., Tashmukhambetov B.T. Implementation of the mentoring model for young scientists (at the beginning of their scientific career) of regional universities of the Republic of Kazakhstan to reveal scientific potential. Vestnik Atyrauskogo universiteta imeni H. Dosmuhamedova = Bulletin of Atyrau University named after Kh. Dosmukhamedov. 2024;2(73):75–85. (In Russ.) doi:10.47649/vau.2024.v.73.i2.07

17. Golovachyova V.N., Bashirov A.V., Nakipova G.E., Khanov T.A. Research on factors that activate university students’ research work using the iterative examination process. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2024;26(7):44–69. (In Russ.) doi:10.17853/1994-5639-2024-7- 44-69

18. Ahmad Z., Al-Thani N.J. Undergraduate research experience models: a systematic review of the literature from 2011 to 2021. International Journal of Educational Research. 2022;114:101996. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101996

19. Mieg H.A., Odebiyi F., Haberstroh S. Toward an undergraduate research network in Europe and beyond. Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research. 2024;7(3):34–40. doi:10.18833/spur/7/3/2

20. Park Sung Hyun, Kim Kwang Ki, Lee Kyung Hwa. Neuro-educational study on the development of creative teaching program and its effect. Procedia – Social’nye i povedencheskie nauki = Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;186:1–8.

21. Cain L., Goldring J., Westall A. Seeing behind the curtain: reverse mentoring within the higher education landscape. Teaching in Higher Education. 2022;29(5):1267–1282. doi:10.1080/13562517.2022.2129963

22. Bowman N.A., Holmes J.M. Getting off to a good start? First-year undergraduate research experiences and student outcomes. Higher Education. 2018;76:17–33. Accessed February 15, 2025. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10734-017-0191-4

23. Xerri M.J., Radford K., Shacklock K. Student engagement in academic activities: a social support perspective. Higher Education. 2018;75:589–605. Accessed February 18, 2025. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10734-017-0162-9

24. Kahu E.R., Nelson K. Student engagement in the educational interface: understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research & Development. 2018;37(1):58–71. doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197

25. Lardy L., Bressoux Pr.P., Clercq M.D. Achievement of first-year students at the university: a multilevel analysis of the role of background diversity and student engagement. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 2022;37:949–969. Accessed February 15, 2025. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10212-021-00570-0

26. Yang Da. The design and implementation of scientific research management system in university. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Mechatronics, Computer and Education Informationization. 2016;130:756–759. doi:10.2991/mcei-16.2016.157

27. Atkins K., Dougan B.M., Dromgold-Sermen M.S., et al. “Looking at myself in the future”: how mentoring shapes scientific identity for STEM students from underrepresented groups. International Journal of STEM Education. 2020;7:42. Accessed February 18, 2025. https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40594-020-00242-3

28. Bowden J.L.-H., Tickle L., Naumann K. The four pillars of tertiary student engagement and success: a holistic measurement approach. Studies in Higher Education. 2021;46(6):1207–1224. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1672647

29. Trolian T.L., Jach E.A., Archibald G.C. Shaping students’ career attitudes toward professional success: examining the role of student faculty. Interactions Innovative Higher Education. 2021;46:111– 131. Accessed February 18, 2025. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10755-020-09529-3

30. Stewart M., Stott T., Nuttall A.-M. Study goals and procrastination tendencies at different stages of the undergraduate degree. Studies in Higher Education. 2016;41(11):2028–2043. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1005590

31. Guo J.-P., Yang L.-Y., Zhang J., Gan Y.-J. Academic self-concept, perceptions of the learning environment, engagement, and learning outcomes of university students: relationships and causal ordering. Higher Education. 2022;83:809–828. Accessed February 25, 2025. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10734-021-00705-8

32. Smyth L., Davila F., Sloan T., et al. How science really works the student experience of researched education. Higher Education. 2016;72:191–207. doi:10.1007/s10734-015-9945-z

33. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2020;61:101860. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

34. Ferrer J., Ringer A., Saville K., Parris M.A., Kash K. Students’ motivation and engagement in higher education: the importance of attitude to online learning. Higher Education. 2022;83:317–338. doi:10.1007/s10734-020-00657-5

35. Morales D.X., Grineski S.E., Collins T.W. Faculty motivation to mentor students through undergraduate research programs: a study of enabling and constraining factors. Research in Higher Education. 2017;58(5):520–544. Accessed April 14, 2025. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1147421

36. Ommering B.W.C., Wijnen-Meijer M., Dolmans D.H.J.M., Dekker F.W., van Blankenstein F.M. Promoting positive perceptions of and motivation for research among undergraduate medical students to stimulate future research involvement: a grounded theory study. BMC Medical Education. 2020;20:204. doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02112-6

37. Linn M.C., Palmer E., Baranger A., Gerard E., Stone E. Undergraduate research experiences: impacts and opportunities. Science. 2015;347(6222):1261757. doi:10.1126/science.1261757

38. Adams S.K. Empowering and motivating undergraduate students through the process of developing publishable research. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;10:2415. Accessed April 14, 2025. https://pmc. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6509154/

39. Shapiro C., Moberg-Parker J., Tangalos G., Lewis-Fitzgerald M., Sanders E.R. Comparing the impact of course-based and apprentice-based research experiences in an undergraduate lab curriculum. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education. 2015;16(2):50–61. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v16i2.1045

40. Baidarova A.U., Elsieva Sh.S.-T. Use of information technology tools in organizing students’ research work. Ehkonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya = Economy and Management: Problems, Solutions. 2024. (In Russ.) doi:10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2024.12.05.021

41. Aminov I.B., Khodjaeva D.F. Efficiency of using information resources and technology in students’ research work. Bjulleten’ nauki i praktiki = Bulletin of Science and Practice. 2017;2(15):310–313. (In Russ.) Accessed April 14, 2025. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28320228&ysclid=m9n14dvuy857675384

42. Yurmazova T.A., Shakhova N.V., Miroshnichenko Yu.Yu. Research competence of a teacher as a factor in the successful organization of research work. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2012;5. (In Russ.) Accessed February 25, 2025. https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=7125

43. Ambarova P.A., Shabrova N.V. Measures to support students’ research work and scientific mentoring in Russian universities. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2024;33(10):60– 82. (In Russ.) doi:10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-10-60-82

44. Griffioen D.M.E. Differences in students’ experiences of research involvement: study years and disciplines compared. Further and Higher Education. 2019;44(4):454–466. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2019.1579894