Digital socialisation and parental mediation in the digital activities of children with disabilities
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2026-1-165-190
Abstract
Introduction. This article investigates the factors influencing digital socialisation and their relationship with digital parental mediation strategies, within the context of educating children with disabilities. The relevance of this work arises from the limited existing research on digital socialisation for this specific category of pupils, combined with the acknowledged, pivotal role of parents and the pervasive digitalisation of contemporary society. Aim. This study aims to identify and analyse the structure of factors affecting the digital socialisation of children with disabilities, and to establish the correlations between these factors and parental mediation strategies. Methodology and research methods. The study is grounded in the cultural-historical approach of L. S. Vygotsky and the socio-cognitive concept of digital socialisation developed by G. U. Soldatova and A. E. Voiskunsky. The empirical component involved an online survey employing an adapted version of the “Digital Parental Mediation Questionnaire” alongside an author-designed questionnaire to evaluate factors influencing digital socialisation. The sample comprised parents of schoolchildren with impairments in intelligence, hearing, vision, or speech (n = 419), as well as a control group of parents of typically developing peers (n = 77). Results and scientific novelty. Factor analysis revealed a four-factor structure of digital socialisation: the child’s digital competence index, the parent’s digital competence index, the educational and social value factor of the digital environment, and the individual-personal factor. It was established that the strongest associations were observed between the components of the educational and social value factor of the digital environment and all mediation strategies. The weakest correlation was recorded between the individual-personal factor and control strategies. Practical significance. The findings of the study can be applied to the development of advanced training programmes for teachers and the psychological and pedagogical support of children with disabilities. They can also be used to optimise the planning of educational activities, taking into account the identified factors of digital socialisation.
Keywords
About the Authors
Y. A. KorolevaRussian Federation
Yulia A. Koroleva – Cand. Sci. (Psychology), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Special Psychology
Researcher ID AAX-8885-2021
Author ID 650564
Orenburg
E. S. Fominykh
Russian Federation
Ekaterins S. Fominykh – Cand. Sci. (Psychology), Associate Professor, Department of Special Psychology
Researcher ID AEQ-7946-2022
Orenburg
E. I. Andreeva
Russian Federation
Elena I. Andreeva – Cand. Sci. (Psychology), Associate Professor, Department of Special Psychology
Researcher ID NQF-5283-2025
Orenburg
References
1. Soldatova G.U., Nestik T.A., Rasskazova E.I., Dorokhov E.A. Psychodiagnostics of technophobia and technophilia: development and testing a questionnaire of attitudes towards technology for adolescents and parents. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society. 2021;12(4):170–188. (In Russ.) doi:10.17759/sps.2021120410
2. Vygotsky L.S. Psixologiya razvitiya cheloveka = Psychology of Human Development. Moscow: Publishing House Eksmo; 2003. 1136 p. (In Russ.) Accessed August 10, 2025. https://yanko.lib.ru/books/psycho/vygotsky=ps_pzv_cheloveka=ann.htm
3. Soldatova G.U., Vojskunskij A.E. Socio-cognitive concept of digital socialization: а new ecosystem and social evolution of the mind. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki = Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics. 2021;(3):431–450. (In Russ.) doi:10.17323/1813-8918-2021-3-431-450
4. Denisenkova N.S., Taruntaev P.I. The relationship between parent-child relationships and the use of digital devices by older preschoolers. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society. 2023;14(3):31–45. (In Russ.) doi:10.17759/sps.2023140303
5. Lenkov S.L., Rubtsova N.E., Efremova G.I. Questionnaire of involvement in cybersocialization. Yaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik = Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2019;6(111):109–119. (In Russ.) doi:10.24411/1813-145X-2019-567
6. Aimaletdinov T.A., Baimuratova L.R., Zaitseva O.A., Imaeva G.R., Spiridonova L.V. Cifrovaja gramotnost’ rossijskih pedagogov. Gotovnost’ k ispol’zovaniju cifrovyh tehnologij v uchebnom processe = Digital Literacy of Russian Teachers. Readiness for the Use of Digital Technologies in the Educational Process. Moscow: NAFI Publishing House; 2019. 84 p. (In Russ.) Accessed August 10, 2025. https://d-russia.ru/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/digit-ped.pdf?ysclid=miflv5ek13256219889
7. Tokareva M.V., Malyarchuk N.N. Digital competencies of students with intellectual disabilities. Special’noe obrazovanie = Special Education. 2021;4(64):181–196. (In Russ.) doi:10.26170/1999-6993_2021_04_12
8. Carretero S., Vuorikari R., Punie Y. DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with Eight Proficiency Levels and Examples of Use. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2017. doi:10.2760/38842
9. Rice M., Ortiz K. Parents’ use of digital literacies to support their children with disabilities in online learning environments. Online Learning. 2021;25(3):208–229. doi:10.24059/olj.v25i3.2407
10. Аgren К.А., Kjellberg А., Hemmingsson H. Internet opportunities and risks for adolescents with intellectual disabilities: a comparative study of parents’ perceptions. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2020;27(8):601–613. doi:10.1080/11038128.2020.1770330
11. Borgstedt S., Möller-Slawinski H. Digitale Teilhabe von Menschen mit Behinderung: Trendstudie. Bonn: Aktion Mensch e.V.; 2020. 81 p. (In German) Accessed September 14, 2025. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-86216-7
12. Redecker A. Inklusiv lernen – digital kommunizieren: Schwierigkeiten und Chancen des Interaktiven in der Schule für alle. MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung. 2021;41:15–31. (In German) doi:10.21240/mpaed/41/2021.02.02.X
13. Koroleva Y.A., Fominykh E.S. Rebenok s ogranichennymi vozmozhnostjami zdorov’ja v cifrovom obshhestve = A Child with Disabilities in a Digital Society. Kirov: Publishing House of the MCITO; 2023; 165 p. (In Russ.) Accessed August 10, 2025. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?edn=slfqkr
14. Аgren K.А. Internet Use and Digital Participation in Everyday Life: Adolescents and Young Adults with Intellectual Disabilities. Linköping: LiU-Tryck; 2020. 103 p. doi:10.3384/diss.diva-168070
15. Hurd C., Evans C., Renwick R. “Having friends is like having marshmallows”: perspectives of transition-aged youths with intellectual and developmental disabilities on friendship. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 2018;31:1186–1196. doi:10.1111/JAR.12493
16. Zaynel N. Internetnutzung von Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen mit Down-Syndrom. Wiesbaden: Springer VS; 2017. 287 p. (In German) doi:10.1007/978-3-658-17754-6
17. Kushwaha R.Kr., Yadav M.K., Ahmad S. Digital parenting among students with intellectual disabilities: challenges & strategies. International Journal of Religion Education and Law. 2024;03(01):1–4. doi:10.57235/ijrael.v3i1.1147
18. Lussier-Desrochers D., Normand C.L., Romero-Torres A., Lachapelle Y. Bridging the digital divide for people with intellectual disability. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace. 2017;11(1):1. doi:10.5817/CP2017-1-1
19. Filk C. “Onlife”-Partizipation für alle. Plädoyer für eine inklusiv-digitale Bildung. In: Burow O.-A., ed. Schule digital – wie geht das? Wie die digitale Revolution uns und die Schule verändert. Weinheim Basel: Beltz-Verlag; 2019:62–82. (In German)
20. Sallafranque-St-Louis F., Normand C.L. From solitude to solicitation: how people with intellectual disability or autism spectrum disorder use the Internet. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace. 2017;11(1):7. doi:10.5817/CP2017-1-7
21. Soldatova G.U. Digital socialization in the cultural-historical paradigm: a changing child in a changing world. Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society. 2018;9(3):71–80. (In Russ.) doi:10.17759/sps.2018090308
22. Zaman B., Nouwen M., Vanattenhoven J., Ferrerre E., Looy J.V. A qualitative inquiry into the contextualized parental mediation practices of young children’s digital media use at home. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 2016;60(1):1–22. doi:10.1080/08838151.2015.1127240
23. Smirnova E.A., Smirnova S.Yu., Sheina E.G. Parental strategies in children’s use of digital technologies. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psixologiya = Modern Foreign Psychology. 2019;8(4):79–87. (In Russ.) doi:10.17759/jmfp.2019080408
24. Rudnova N.A., Kornienko D.S., Volkova E.N., Isaeva O.M. Digital parental mediation and its relationship to the psychological well-being of school-age children. Nauka televideniya = The Science of Television. 2023;19(1):175–198. (In Russ.) doi:10.30628/1994-9529-2023-19.1-175-198
25. Üstündağ-Alkan R., Aslan A., Turgut Y.E., Kurşun E. Factors affecting parental mediation strategies in children’s technology use: a systematic review. Journal of Computer and Education Research. 2021;9(18):702–723. doi:10.18009/jcer.925859
26. Soldatova G.U., Nestik T.A., Rasskazova E.I., Zotova E.Y. Cifrovaya kompetentnost’ podrostkov i roditelej. Rezul’taty vserossijskogo issledovaniya = Digital Competence of Adolescents and Parents. Results of a National Survey. Moscow: Internet Development Foundation; 2013. 144 p. (In Russ.) Accessed September 14, 2025. https://ifap.ru/library/book536.pdf
27. Leshcheva A.A., Azletskaya E.N. On the problems of developing digital competence of students with disabilities. Mir pedagogiki i psikhologii: mezhdunarodnyj nauchno-prakticheskij zhurnal = World of Pedagogy and Psychology: International Scientific and Practical Journal. 2024;06(95). (In Russ.) Accessed September 14, 2025. https://scipress.ru/pedagogy/articles/o-problemakh-razvitiya-tsifrovoj-kompetentnosti-obuchayushhikhsya-s-ogranichennymi-vozmozhnostyami-zdorovya.html
28. Skripnichenko V.V., Alentieva E.I., Kurbangalieva Y.Y. Application of digital educational resources in interaction with families of children with disabilities: problems, prospects. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya = World of Science, Culture, Education. 2025;2(111):172–175. (In Russ.) doi:10.24412/1991-5497-2025-2111-172-175
29. Kolomiitseva O.V. Features of including children with special needs in the educational process in a digital environment. Gumanitarnye nauki = Humanities. 2023;3(63):116–121. (In Russ.) Accessed September 14, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-vklyucheniya-v-uchebnyy-protsess-v-tsifrovoy-srede-detey-s-ovz?ysclid=mifm2yhgbq968518691
30. Starshinova A.V., Shestakova E.V. Resources for enhancing parental competence in the rehabilitation of a child with disabilities .Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2025;27(1):168–199. (In Russ.) doi:10.17853/1994-5639-2025-1-168-199
31. Kisova V.V., Shevchenko M.V. The influence of digital socialization on the formation of personality in adolescents with developmental disorders. Pedagogicheskij vestnik = Pedagogical Bulletin. 2023;30:50–52. (In Russ.) Accessed September 14, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vliyanie-tsifrovoy-sotsializatsii-na-stanovlenie-lichnosti-podrostkov-s-narusheniyami-razvitiya
32. Nikken P. Implications of low or high media use among parents for young children’s media use. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace. 2017;11(3):1. doi:10.5817/CP2017-3-1
Review
For citations:
Koroleva Y.A., Fominykh E.S., Andreeva E.I. Digital socialisation and parental mediation in the digital activities of children with disabilities. The Education and science journal. 2026;28(1):165-190. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2026-1-165-190
JATS XML





























