Preview

The Education and science journal

Advanced search

Designing an AI assistant to support independent learning in first -and second-year students

https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2026-6-163-200

Abstract

Introduction. The challenge of developing and utilising flexible learning systems has become especially pertinent with the advent of generative neural network models, which not only facilitate the creation of educational content but also transform traditional approaches to organising independent student work. This article explores the design of an intelligent assistant – an AI assistant – implemented as an automated learning system, whose functionalities are underpinned by AI technologies. Aim. The present study aims to identify and examine the features involved in designing an AI assistant that integrates a teacher’s expert knowledge with AI capabilities, using the example of supporting independent work in the disciplines of mathematics and information technology. Methodology and research methods. The study employed methods of educational process modelling to design scenarios and algorithms for the operation of the AI assistant. For the practical implementation of the AI assistant, methods for designing adaptive learning systems were utilised, alongside AI methods and technologies. Results and scientific novelty. The concept of an “AI assistant” is defined as an adaptive, automated learning system with feedback, realised through the application of AI technologies. Based on a model of guided learning activity, typical scenarios for student interaction with the AI assistant have been identified. A prototype of the AI assistant, comprising two components (teacher assistant and student assistant), was developed and tested. The AI assistant is founded on an adaptive learning system model that incorporates variable didactic resources, independent work scenarios, interaction algorithms for both students and teachers, and a digital footprint data analysis subsystem. Practical significance. The use of an AI assistant to support independent work among students at the School of Computer Science, University of Tyumen, has confirmed the need for comprehensive pedagogical modelling of learning systems that incorporate AI technologies, as well as the importance of involving teachers as leading experts in their design and evaluation.

About the Authors

A. A. Zakharov
University of Tyumen
Russian Federation

Aleksandr A. Zakharov – Dr. Sci. (Engineering), Professor, Academic Department, School of Computer Science

Tyumen



I. G. Zakharova
University of Tyumen
Russian Federation

Irina G. Zakharova – Dr. Sci. (Education), Professor, Academic Department, School of Computer Science  

Tyumen



A. M. Shabalin
University of Tyumen
Russian Federation

Andrey M. Shabalin – Cand. Sci. (Education), Associate Professor, Academic Department, School of Computer Science

Tyumen



Q. H. Nguyen
University of Tyumen
Russian Federation

Quang H. Nguyen – Assistant, Academic Department, School of Computer Science

Tyumen



References

1. Vavilova D.D., Kasatkina E.V., Faizullin R.V. Assessing the scaling potential of artificial intelligence tools in higher education: Russian and international experiences. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2025;27(9):128–157. (In Russ.) doi:10.17853/1994-5639-2025-8-128-157

2. Konstantinova L.V., Vorozhikhin V.V., Petrov A.M., Titova E.S., Shtykhno D.A. Generative artificial intelligence in education: discussions and forecasts. Otkrytoe obrazovanie = Open Education. 2023;27(2):36–48. (In Russ.) doi:10.21686/1818-4243-2023-2-36-48

3. Pospelova E.A., Ototsky P.L., Gorlacheva E.N., Faizullin R.V. Generative artificial intelligence in education: current trends and prospects. Professional’noe obrazovanie i rynok truda = Vocational Education and Labour Market. 2024;12(3):6–21. (In Russ.) doi:10.52944/PORT.2024.58.3.001

4. Osipova L.B. Artificial intelligence in education: real opportunities and prospects. Vestnik Permskogo nacional’nogo issledovatel’skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Social’no-ekonomicheskie nauki = PNRPU Sociology and Economics Bulletin. 2024;1:60–73. (In Russ.) doi:10.15593/2224-9354/2024.1.5

5. Gökçearslan S., Tosun C., Erdemir Z.G. Benefits, challenges, and methods of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots in education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Technology in Education. 2024;7(1):19–39. doi:10.46328/ijte.600

6. Ma W., Ma W., Hu Y., Bi X. The who, why, and how of AI-based chatbots for learning and teaching in higher education: a systematic review. Education and Information Technologies. 2025;30(6):7781– 7805. doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13128-6

7. Davar N.F., Dewan M.A.A., Zhang X. AI chatbots in education: challenges and opportunities. Information. 2025;16(3):235. doi:10.3390/info16030235

8. Melnikov A.V., Nikolaev I.E., Rusanov M.A., Abbazov V.R. Comparative analysis of RAG methods for building Russian-speaking intelligent services. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Komp’yuternye tekhnologii, upravlenie, radioelektronika = Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Computer Technologies, Automatic Control, Radio Electronics. 2025;25(2):5–18. (In Russ.) doi:10.14529/ctcr250201

9. Swacha J., Gracel M. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) chatbots for education: a survey of applications. Applied Sciences. 2025;15(8):4234. doi:10.3390/app15084234

10. Li Z., Wang Z., Wang W., Hung K., Xie H., Wang F.L. Retrieval-augmented generation for educational application: a systematic survey. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 2025;8:100417. doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100417

11. Lee D., Palmer E. Prompt engineering in higher education: a systematic review to help inform curricula. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2025;22(1):7. doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00503-7

12. Sysoyev P.V. A modern teacher’s competence in the field of artificial intelligence: structure and content. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2025;34(6):58–79. (In Russ.) doi:10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-6-58-79

13. Zawacki-Richter O., Marín V.I., Bond M., Gouverneur F. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2019;16(1):1–27. doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

14. Crompton H., Burke D. Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2023;20(1):22. doi:10.1186/s41239-02300392-8

15. Bearman M., Ryan J., Ajjawi R. Discourses of artificial intelligence in higher education: a critical literature review. Higher Education. 2023;86(2):369–385. doi:10.1007/s10734-022-00937-2

16. Mah D.K., Groß N. Artificial intelligence in higher education: exploring faculty use, self-efficacy, distinct profiles, and professional development needs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2024;21(1):58. doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00490-1

17. Ren X., Wu M.L. Examining teaching competencies and challenges while integrating artificial intelligence in higher education. TechTrends. 2025;69:519–538. doi:10.1007/s11528-025-01055-3

18. Chiu T.K., Ahmad Z., Çoban M. Development and validation of teacher artificial intelligence (AI) competence self-efficacy (TAICS) scale. Education and Information Technologies. 2025;30(5):6667– 6685. doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13094-z

19. Schmidt D.A., Alboloushi B., Thomas A., Magalhaes R. Integrating artificial intelligence in higher education: perceptions, challenges, and strategies for academic innovation. Computers and Education Open. 2025;9:100274. doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100274

20. Verboom A.D.P.R., Pais L., Zijlstra F.R., Oswald F.L., Santos N.R.D. Perceptions of artificial intelligence in academic teaching and research: a qualitative study from AI experts and professors’ perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2025;22(1):46. doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00546-w

21. Zhang X., Zhang X., Liu H. Reflections on enhancing higher education classroom effectiveness through the introduction of large language models. Journal of Modern Educational Research. 2024;3:19. doi:10.53964/jmer.2024019

22. Qian Y. Prompt engineering in education: a systematic review of approaches and educational applications. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2025;63(7-8):1782–1818. doi:10.1177/07356331251365189

23. Melisa R., Ashadi A., Triastuti A., Hidayati S., Salido A., Ero P.E.L., et al. Critical thinking in the age of AI: a systematic review of AI’s effects on higher education. Educational Process: International Journal. 2025;14:e2025031. doi:10.22521/edupij.2025.14.31

24. Hikmawati A., Mohammad N.K. Enhancing critical thinking with Gen AI: a literature review. Buletin Edukasi Indonesia. 2025;4(01):40–46. doi:10.56741/bei.v4i01.764

25. Salido A., Syarif I., Sitepu M.S., Wana P.R., Taufika R., Melisa R. Integrating critical thinking and artificial intelligence in higher education: a bibliometric and systematic review of skills and strategies. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 2025;12:101924. doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101924

26. Morales-Chan M., Amado-Salvatierra H.R., Hernandez-Rizzardini R. AI-driven content creation: revolutionizing educational materials. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale; 2024; New York, USA. New York, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2024:556–558. doi:10.1145/3657604.3664640

27. Khalil M., Liu Q., Jovanovic J. AI for data generation in education: towards learning and teaching support at scale. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2025;56(3):993–998. doi:10.1111/bjet.13580

28. Lee S., Song K. Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of AI-generated concept explanations: implications for integrating generative AI in computer science education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 2024;7:100283. doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100283

29. Song T., Zhang H., Xiao Y. A high-quality generation approach for educational programming projects using LLM. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. 2024;17:2296–2309. doi:10.1109/tlt.2024.3499751

30. Danilov A.V., Zaripova R.R., Lukoyanova M.A., Batrova N.I., Salekhova L.L. Effectiveness of prompt engineering strategies in generating mathematics educational content: an experimental study. Science for Education Today. 2025;4:113–135. (In Russ.) doi:10.15293/2658-6762.2504.05

31. Schorcht S., Buchholtz N., Baumanns L. Prompt the problem – investigating the mathematics educational quality of AI-supported problem solving by comparing prompt techniques. Frontiers in Education. 2024;9:1386075. doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1386075

32. Meissner R., Pögelt A., Ihsberner K., Grüttmüller M., Tornack S., Thor A., et al. LLM-generated competence-based e-assessment items for higher education mathematics: methodology and evaluation. Frontiers in Education. 2024;9:1427502. doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1427502

33. Huang Q., Lv C., Lu L., Tu S. Evaluating the quality of AI-generated digital educational resources for university teaching and learning. Systems. 2025;13(3):174. doi:10.3390/systems13030174

34. Dickey E., Bejarano A. GAIDE: a framework for using generative AI to assist in course content development. In: Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE); 2024; Washington, USA. New York, USA: IEEE; 2024:10893132. doi:10.1109/FIE61694.2024.10893132

35. Sinha A., Goyal S., Sy Z., Kuperus R., Dickey E., Bejarano A. BoilerTAI: a platform for enhancing instruction using generative AI in educational forums. In: Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE); 2024; Washington, USA. New York, USA: IEEE; 2024:10893137. doi:10.1109/FIE61694.2024.10893137

36. Aperstein Y., Cohen Y., Apartsin A. Generative AI-based platform for deliberate teaching practice: a review and a suggested framework. Education Sciences. 2025;15(4):405. doi:10.3390/educsci15040405

37. Wessel M., Adam M., Benlian A., Majchrzak A., Thies F. Generative AI and its transformative value for digital platforms. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2025;42(2):346–369. doi:10.1080/07421222.2025.2487315

38. Zakharov A.A., Zakharova I.G., Shabalin A.M., Khanbekov Sh.I., Dzhalilzoda D.B. Intelligent voice assistant as an example of inclusive design methodology implementation. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2024;26(3):149–175. (In Russ.) doi:10.17853/1994-5639-20243-149-175

39. Jasti S.D., Pavani A. Employing problem based learning system in advancing communication skills proficiency in professional communication for engineering undergraduates. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations. 2021;34:128–134. doi:10.16920/jeet/2021/v34i0/157119

40. Ouariach S., Ouariach F.Z., Khaldi M. A software engineering approach for conceptualising an online learning scenario for a deductive approach. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering Informatics. 2025;13(1):1–25. doi:10.1504/IJIEI.2025.144277

41. Inayat U., Zia M.F., Mahmood S., Khalid H.M., Benbouzid M. Learning-based methods for cyber attacks detection in IoT systems: a survey on methods, analysis, and future prospects. Electronics. 2022;11(9):1502. doi:10.3390/electronics11091502

42. Sujatha S., Vinayakan K. Integrating math and real-world applications: a review of practical approaches to teaching. International Journal of Computational Research and Development. 2023;8(2):55–60. doi:10.5281/zenodo.16150481

43. Rakhimov A.A. The use of information technologies and interactive teaching methods in mathematics classes during cycle training at a technical university. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Informatizaciya obrazovaniya = RUDN Journal of Informatization in Education. 2024;21(1):35–43. (In Russ.) doi:10.22363/2312-8631-2024-21-1-35-43

44. Ochkov V.F., Shatskikh Yu.V., Tikhonov A.I. A new approach to teaching mathematics in universities. Otkrytoe obrazovanie = Open Education. 2025;29(5):55–64. (In Russ.) doi:10.21686/1818-42432025-5-55-64

45. Ramos B., Condotta R. Enhancing learning and collaboration in a unit operations course: using AI as a catalyst to create engaging problem-based learning scenarios. Journal of Chemical Education. 2024;101(8):3246–3254. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00244

46. Hwang K., Challagundla S., Alomair M., Chen L.K., Choa F.S. Towards AI-assisted multiple choice question generation and quality evaluation at scale: aligning with Bloom’s taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Generative AI for Education; 2023; New Orleans, USA. Accessed December 25, 2025. https://gaied.org/neurips2023/files/17/17_paper.pdf

47. Kunuku M.T., Dehbozorgi N. Exploring multimodal quiz generation and evaluation aligned with higher-order learning objectives in Bloom’s taxonomy In: Cristea A.I., Walker E., Lu Y., Santos O.C., Isotani, S., eds. Artificial Intelligence in Education. Cham: Springer; 2025:433–438. doi:10.1007/9783-031-99261-2_49


Review

For citations:


Zakharov A.A., Zakharova I.G., Shabalin A.M., Nguyen Q.H. Designing an AI assistant to support independent learning in first -and second-year students. The Education and science journal. 2026;28(6):163-200. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2026-6-163-200

Views: 209

JATS XML

ISSN 1994-5639 (Print)
ISSN 2310-5828 (Online)