Preview

The Education and science journal

Advanced search

FORMATION PROGRAM IN MATHEMATICS AT THE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY AND THE QUALITY OF KNOWLEDGE

https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-1-34-49

Abstract

The aim of the study is to discuss the maintenance of the educational programs for mathematical disciplines existing at the higher school and problems of teaching mathematics at training of specialists of the engineering directions.

Activity and competence basis of mathematical education of engineers can not be increased within a tough part of the conservative academic programs in mathematics. Program in mathematics for undergraduate engineering training areas do not meet the needs of engineering professional education. They meet the requirements of educational standards only in form, but in fact, are copies of traditional academic programs of the last century. Absence of accurate recommendations about reconstruction of mathematical chairs of curricula, operating decades habitual for teachers, leads only to formal mechanical reduction of the hours which are taken away on studying of the demanded sections and subjects.

Methods. The methods involve analysis, generalization, and written anonymous survey among students.

Results and scientific novelty. Analysis of existing programs, the results of their assimilation, and the teaching of mathematics in general leads to the need to put forward new real principles of the program of mathematical disciplines. As such new principles of selection of the content of mathematical preparation the principles of lacunarity, reliability, minimalism, selectivity and ICT-support are offered. The methods of realization of these principles are the following: analysis of competences, analysis of scientific articles and theses on group of the scientific specialties connected with the directions of training, carrying out analogies, interviewing of key experts and teachers, expert estimates, formalization of requirements, etc. Restructuring of mathematics programs is designed to develop logical and algorithmic thinking of engineering students; to cultivate an applied mathematical culture; formation of insight and erudition in mathematics application.

Practical significance. Research implications may be useful to managers and training specialists of Mathematical Departments of technical universities, program builders in mathematics and educational standards in engineering fields.

About the Author

Y. P. Bogomolova
National Research University «Moscow Power Engineering Institute»
Russian Federation

Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Associate Professor,

Moscow



References

1. Aganina K. J., Telekbaeva K. U. Integracija matematicheskih disciplin v processe podgotovki inzhenerno-tehnicheskih special’nostej. [Integration of mathematical disciplines in the preparation of technical specialties]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. [Education and Science. News of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Education]. 2012. № 3 (92). P. 123–132. (In Russian)

2. Archangelsky S. I. Lekcii po teorii obuchenija v vysshej shkole. [Lectures on the theory of learning in higher educatio. Moscow: Publishing House Vysshaja shkola. [Higher School]. 1984. 384 p. (In Russian)

3. Borovskikh A., Popov L., Rozov N. Chto takoe standart i chto takoe «ne-standart»? [What is the standard and that is «non-standard»?]. Pedagogika. [Pedagogy]. 2013. № 2. P. 45–57. (In Russian)

4. Bogomolova E. P. Setevye obrazovatel’nye matematicheskie resursy. [Network educational math resources]. Trudy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-metodicheskoj konferencii «Informatizacija inzhenernogo obrazovanija» – INFORINO – 2012, Moskva, 10–11 aprelja 2012 g. [Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference «Informatization of Engineering Education» – INFORINO 2012 (Moscow, 10–11 April 2012)]. Moscow: Publishing House MJeI, 2012. P. 423–424. (In Russian)

5. Bogomolova E. P. Prezentacionnye lekcii po disciplinam estestvenno-nauchnogo cikla: praktika i teorija. [Presentation lectures on the subjects of science cycle: the practice and theory]. Otkrytoe obrazovanie. [Open Education]. 2014. № 4. P. 53–61. (In Russian)

6. Bogomolova E. P. Diagnoz: matematicheski malogramotnyj. [Diagnosis: mathematically illiterate]. Matematika v shkole. [Mathematics at School]. 2014. № 4. P. 3–9. (In Russian)

7. Bogomolova E. P. Ot matematicheskoj malogramotnosti k matematicheskim kompetencijam. [From the mathematical illiteracy to mathematical competencies]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 20: Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie. [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 20: Pedagogical Education]. 2015. № 3. P. 3–20. (In Russian)

8. Bogomolova E. P., Baranenkov A. I., Petrushko I. M. Sbornik zadach i tipovyh raschetov po obshhemu i special’nym kursam vysshej matematiki. [Collection of problems and model calculations on the general and special courses of Mathematics]. S.-Petersburg: Publishing House Lan’, 2015. 464 p. (In Russian)

9. Bogomolova E. P., Maksimova O. V. Analiz metodami matematicheskoj statistiki vlijanija internet – podderzhki na process obuchenija matematike vo vtuze. [Analysis of the methods of mathematical statistics the impact of the Internet – support the process of teaching mathematics in the technical colleges]. Informacionno-tehnologicheskoe obespechenie obrazovatel’nogo processa sovremennogo universiteta. [Information-Technological Support of the Educational Process of Modern University]. Sbornik dokladov Mezhdunarodnoj internet-konferencii, Minsk, 1–30 nojab. 2013 g. [Collected works of International Internet Conference. Minsk, 1–30 November, 2013]. Minsk: Belorusskij gosudarstvennyj universitet. [Belarusian State University].2014. P. 273–286. Available at: http://elib.bsu.by/handle/123456789/89685. (In Russian)

10. Bogomolova E. P., Ochkov V. F., Heynloo M. Reshateli ili velikolepnaja semerka MATHCAD. [Solvers or The Magnificent Seven MATHCAD]. Otkrytoe obrazovanie. [Open Education]. 2015. № 3. P. 37–50. (In Russian)

11. Zagvyazinsky V. I.. Strategicheskie orientiry razvitija otechestvennogo obrazovanija i puti ih realizacii. [Strategic guidelines for the development of national education and ways to implement them]. Innovacionnye proekty i programmy v obrazovanii. [Innovative Projects and Programs in Education]. 2013. V. 2. P. 3–8. (In Russian)

12. Zagvyazinsky V. I., Strokova T. A. Soprotivlenie innovacijam: sushhnost’, sposoby profilaktiki i preodolenija. [Resistance to innovation: the nature, methods for preventing and overcoming]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. [Education and Science. News of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Education]. 2014. № 3 (112). P. 3–21. (In Russian)

13. Zeer E. F., Symanyuk E. E. Kompetentnostnyj podhod kak faktor realizacii innovacionnogo obrazovanija. [Competence approach as a factor in the implementation of innovative education]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. [Education and Science. News of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Education]. 2011. № 8 (87). P. 3–14. (In Russian)

14. Zimina O. V., Kirillov A. I. Prakticheskie zanjatija po vysshej matematike s ispol’zovaniem mobil’nogo dostupa k matematicheskomu serveru Moskovskomu jenergeticheskomu institutu. [Practical exercises on higher mathematics with mobile access to mathematical server of Moscow Power Engineering Institute]. Moscow: Moskovskij jenergeticheskij institut. [Moscow Power Engineering Institute]. 2011. 222 p. (In Russian)

15. Kudryavtsev A. J. O principe professional’noj napravlennosti. [On the principle of a professional orientation]. Sovetskaja pedagogika. [Soviet Pedagogy]. 1981. № 8. P. 100–106. (In Russian)

16. Koncepcija razvitija matematicheskogo obrazovanija v Rossijskoj Federacii. [The concept of the development of mathematics education in the Russian Federation]. Rasporjazhenie Pravitel’stva Rossijskoj Federacii ot 24 dekabrja 2013 g. № 2506-r g. Moskva [Order of the Government of the Russian Federation, d.d. 24 December, 2013, № 2506-p, Moscow]. Rossiyskaya Gazeta. [Russian Newspaper]. Available at: http://www.rg.ru/2013/12/27/matematika-site-dok.html (In Russian)

17. Lurie L. I. Kakoj byt’ nauchno-pedagogicheskoj periodike? [What have scientific and pedagogical periodicals?]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. [Education and Science. News of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Education]. 2013. № 1. P. 117–135. (In Russian)

18. Ochkov V. F., Bogomolova E. P., Ivanov D. A., Pisachich K. Dvizhenija planet: raschet i vizualizacija v srede Mathsad ili chasy Keplera. [Movement of the planets: the calculation and visualization in Mathcad or Kepler clock]. Cloud of Science. 2015. V. 2, № 2. P. 177–215. (In Russian)

19. Plis A. I., Slivina N. A. Mathcad. Matematicheskij praktikum. [Mathcad. Math Practical]. Moscow: Publishing House Finansy i statistika. [Finance and Statistics]. 656 p. (In Russian)

20. Polya D. Matematika i pravdopodobnye rassuzhdenija. [Mathematics and plausible reasoning]. Moscow: Publishing House Nauka. [Science]. 1975. 463 p. (In Russian)

21. Prokopiev V. P. O roli matematiki dlja podgotovki kadrov v innovacionnoj jekonomike. [On the role of mathematics for training in the innovation economy]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. [Education and Science. News of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Education]. 2011. № 9 (88). P. 60–68. (In Russian)

22. Pryamikova E. V. Inertnost’ sistemy obrazovanija: mif ili real’nost’. [The inertia of the education system: Myth or Reality]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. [Education and Science. News of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Education]. 2011. № 2 (81). P. 53–63. (In Russian)

23. Poincaré A. O nauke. [About science]. Moscow: Publishing House Nauka. [Science]. 1983. 560 p. (In Russian)

24. Serikov V. V. Ideja, zamysel i gipoteza v pedagogicheskom issledovanii. [The idea, design and pedagogical research hypothesis]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. [Education and Science. News of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Education]. 2010. № 10 (78). P. 30–41. (In Russian)

25. Sobkin V. S. Tkachenko O. V. V. Student pedagogicheskogo vuza: zhiznennye i professional’nye perspektivy. [A student of pedagogical high school: the life and career prospects]. Trudy po sociologii obrazovanija. [Works on the sociology of education]. Vol. XI–XII, № XXI. Moscow: Centr sociologii obrazovanija RAO. [Center for the Sociology of Education of the Russian Academy of Education]. 2007. 200 p. (In Russian)

26. Testov V. A. O ponjatii pedagogicheskoj paradigmy. [On the notion of pedagogical paradigm]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. [Education and Science. News of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Education]. 2012. № 9. P. 5–14. (In Russian)

27. Tkachenko E. V., Smirnov I. P. Professional’noe obrazovanie: est’ li strategija ego razvitija? [Vocational education: is there a development strategy?]. JeTAP: jekonomicheskaja teorija, analiz, praktika. [STEP: Economic Theory, Analysis, and Practice]. 2013. № 5. P. 51–66. (In Russian)

28. Tryapitsyna A. P. Cennostno-smyslovye orientiry postroenija soderzhanija discipliny «Pedagogika». [Value and meaning construction of the maintenance of discipline «Pedagogy»]. Pis’ma v Jemissija. Offlajn. [The Emissia. Letters Offline]. Jelektronnoe nauchnoe izdanie. [Electronic scientific edition]. 2009. Available at: http://www.emissia.org/offline/2009/1339.htm (In Russian)

29. Federal’nye gosudarstvennye obrazovatel’nye standarty vysshego professional’nogo obrazovanija: arhiv fajlov FGOS VPO. [The Federal State Educational Standards of Higher Education. Archive files FSES of Higher Pedagogical Education]. Available at: // http://www.edu.ru/db/portal/spe/archiv_new.htm (In Russian)

30. Federal’nye gosudarstvennye obrazovatel’nye standarty vysshego professional’nogo obrazovanija. [The Federal State Educational Standards of Higher Education]. Arhiv fajlov FGOS VPO 201000 Biotehnicheskie sistemy i tehnologii. [Archive files FSES of Higher Pedagogical Education. 201000 Biotechnical Systems and Technology]. Available at: http://www.edu.ru/db/mo/Data/d_09/prm806–1.pdf (In Russian)

31. Feldstein D. I. Problemy kachestva psihologo-pedagogicheskih dissertacionnyh issledovanij i ih sootvetstvie sovremennym nauchnym znanijam i potrebnostjam obshhestva. [Quality problems of psychological and pedagogical dissertations and their compliance with current scientific knowledge and the needs of society]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. [Education and Science. News of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Education]. 2011. № 5. P. 3–27. (In Russian)

32. Choshanov M. A. Obrazovanie i nacional’naja bezopasnost’: sistemnye oshibki v matematicheskom obrazovanii Rossii i SShA. [Education and National Security: The system errors in mathematical education in Russia and the USA]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. [Education and Science. News of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Education]. 2013. № 8 (107). P. 14–31. (In Russian)

33. Ochkov V. F., Bogomolova E. P. Teaching Mathematics with Mathematical Software. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics. 2015. № 5 (1). Р. 265–285. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/jhm/vol5/iss1/15 (Translated from English)


Review

For citations:


Bogomolova Y.P. FORMATION PROGRAM IN MATHEMATICS AT THE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY AND THE QUALITY OF KNOWLEDGE. The Education and science journal. 2016;(1):34-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-1-34-49

Views: 1112


ISSN 1994-5639 (Print)
ISSN 2310-5828 (Online)