DIDACTICS: DEVELOPMENT OR STAGNATION?
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-1-133-144
Abstract
The aim of the paper – the detailed analysis of the monograph «Contents and Structure of Regularities of Process of Training (Theory and Experiment)» which is written by the corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Education (RAE), Doctor of pedagogical sciences, Professor I. I. Logvinov. The book was included into a series «Basic researches of institute of the theory and history of pedagogics of the Russian Academy of Education. Proceedings 2008–2012».
The review of the monograph of I. I. Logvinov has become a reason for reflections of the author of the present publication about actual, most burning issues of a modern Russian educational system: on the status of pedagogics in modern domestic science; evolutions of didactic knowledge and its typology; quality of dissertation researches and emasculation in scientific pedagogical concepts of the fundamental bases; ideologization of didactics and a role of the state in this process.
Sorting basic thesis of I. I. Logvinov’s work, in something agreeing, and in something arguing with the scientist, the author of article claims that it is a serious and necessary work where the extremely important questions concerning the most painful points of the Russian pedagogical science and a condition of our education in general are brought up.
About the Author
I. P. SmirnovRussian Federation
Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor, Moscow
References
1. Bok Derek Kertis. Available at: www.aforizmov.net/xfsearch/derek-bok/. (In Russian)
2. Born M. Fizika v zhizni moego pokolenija. [Physics in life of my generation]. Moscow: Publishing House Nauka. [Science]. 1982. P. 52. (In Russian)
3. Vetoshkin S. A., Galaguzova M. A. Osnovnye ponjatija federal’nogo zakona «Ob obrazovanii v Rossijskoj Federacii». [The basic concepts of the federal law «About Education in the Russian Federation»]. Professional’noe obrazovanie. [Professional Education]. Stolica. [Capital]. 2013. № 7. P. 28. (In Russian)
4. Gerbart I. F. Izbrannye sochinenija. [Selected works]. Vol. I. Moscow, 1940. (In Russian)
5. Komenskij Ja. A., Lokk D., Russo Zh.-Zh., Pestalocci I. G. Pedagogicheskoe nasledie. [Pedagogical heritage]. Moscow: Pedagogika. [Pedagogy]. 1989. 416 p. (In Russian)
6. Laptev V. V., Pisareva S. A. Sovremennoe dissertacionnoe issledovanie v sfere obrazovanija: gumanitarnye osnovanija ocenki kachestva. [Modern dissertation research in education: humanitarian bases of an assessment of quality]. S.-Petersburg: Publishing House Knizhnyj Dom. [Book House]. 2008. P. 48. (In Russian)
7. Lihachev B. T. Pedagogika. [Pedagogy]. 4th edition. Moscow: Publishing House Jurajt-M, 2001. 607 p. (In Russian)
8. Logvinov I. I. Soderzhanie i struktura zakonomernostej processa obuchenija (teorija i jeksperiment). Moscow: Rossijskaja akademija obrazovanija. [Russian Academy of Education]; Izdatel’skij centr Institut jeffektivnyh tehnologij. [Publishing Center of Institute of Effective Technologies]. 2012. P. 180. (In Russian)
9. Panov P. A. PTU i tehnikumy okazalis’ vne zakona. [Technical training colleges and technical schools appeared beyond the law]. Izvestija. [Izvestia. Daily newspaper]. 3 June, 2013. (In Russian)
10. Interv’ju s predsedatelem VAK V. Filippovym na radio «Jeho Moskvy». [Interview with V. Filippov, the Chairman of State Commission for Academic Degrees and Titles. Radio programme on «Echo of Moscow»]. 16.02.2013. Available at: https://yandex.ru/search/?text=%D1%8D%D1%85%D0%BE%20%D0%BC%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B2%D1%8B&lr=54&clid=1920673. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Smirnov I.P. DIDACTICS: DEVELOPMENT OR STAGNATION? The Education and science journal. 2016;(1):133-144. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-1-133-144
Views:
1502
Email this article 