COMPUTATIONAL THINKING
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-2-18-33
Abstract
Abstract. The aim of the research is to draw attention of the educational community to the phenomenon of computational thinking which actively discussed in the last decade in the foreign scientific and educational literature, to substantiate of its importance, practical utility and the right on affirmation in Russian education.
Methods. The research is based on the analysis of foreign studies of the phenomenon of computational thinking and the ways of its formation in the process of education; on comparing the notion of «computational thinking» with related concepts used in the Russian scientific and pedagogical literature.
Results. The concept «computational thinking» is analyzed from the point of view of intuitive understanding and scientific and applied aspects. It is shown as computational thinking has evolved in the process of development of computers hardware and software. The practice-oriented interpretation of computational thinking which dominant among educators is described along with some ways of its formation. It is shown that computational thinking is a metasubject result of general education as well as its tool. From the point of view of the author, purposeful development of computational thinking should be one of the tasks of the Russian education.
Scientific novelty. The author gives a theoretical justification of the role of computational thinking schemes as metasubject results of learning. The dynamics of the development of this concept is described. This process is connected with the evolution of computer and information technologies as well as increase of number of the tasks for effective solutions of which computational thinking is required. Author substantiated the affirmation that including «computational thinking » in the set of pedagogical concepts which are used in the national education system fills an existing gap.
Practical significance. New metasubject result of education associated with the formation of personal and professional qualities the persons living and working in the information society is formulated.
About the Author
Evgeniy K. KhennerRussian Federation
Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Associated Member of the Russian Academy of Education, Professor, Head of Department of Information Technologies
References
1. Grady Booch, Robert A. Maksimchuk, Michael W. Engle, Bobbi J. Young, Jim Conallen, Kelli A. Houston. Ob’ektno-orientirovannyj analiz i proektirovanie s primerami prilozhenij. [Object-oriented analysis and design with applications]. Translated from English. Moscow: Publishing House Williams, 2010. 720 р. (In Russian)
2. Vol’fengagen V. Je. The area between the practical skills and fundamental principles of calculations. Applikativnye vychislitel’nye sistemy. 3-ja mezhdunarodnaja konferencija ASC 2012. [Applicative Computational Systems. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference]. Moscow, 2012. P. 1–7. Available at: http://jurinfor.exponenta.ru/ACS2012/ACS-12_Proceedings-All.pdf. (In Russian)
3. Ershov A. P. Programmirovanie – vtoraja gramotnost’. [Programming as second literacy]. Jelektronnyj arhiv akademika A. P. Ershova. Institut sistem informatiki Sibirskogo otdelenija RAN. [Electronic archive of academician A. P. Yershov. Institute of Informatics Systems, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Available at: http://ershov.iis.nsk.su/russian/second_literacy/pred. (In Russian)
4. Zhuravljova E. Ju. Epistemic status of the digital data in modern scientific research. Voprosy filosofii. [Problems of Philosophy]. 2012. № 2. P. 113–123. (In Russian)
5. Papert S. Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. Translated from English. Moscow: Publishing House Pedagogika. [Pedagogy]. 1989. 220 р. (In Russian)
6. Suhomlin V. A. International educational standards in information technologies. Prikladnaja informatika. [Applied Informatics]. 2012. № 3. P. 33–54. (In Russian)
7. Khenner E. K. Body of knowledge for computing and content of school subject. Informatika i obrazovanie. [Informatics and Education]. 2015. № 7 (266). P. 24–32. (In Russian)
8. Barr V., Stephenson Ch. Bringing Computational Thinking to K-12: What is Involved and What is the Role of the Computer Science Education Community? ACM Inroads 2011 March. Vol. 2. № 1. P. 48–54. Available at: https://csta.acm.org/Curriculum/sub/CurrFiles/BarrStephensonInroadsArticle.pdf. (Translated from English)
9. Exploring Computational Thinking. Google for Education: Available at:
10. https://www.google.com/edu/resources/programs/exploring-computationalthinking/index.html#! home. (Translated from English)
11. Grady Booch, Robert A. Maksimchuk, Michael W. Engle, Bobbi J. Young, Jim Conallen, Kelli A. Houston. Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications. Addison-Wesley. 2007. 691 р. (Translated from English)
12. Operational Definition of Computational Thinking for K-12 Education.Computer Science Teachers Association. Available at: http://csta.acm.org/Curriculum/sub/CompThinking.html. (Translated from English)
13. Papert S. An Exploration in the Space of Mathematics Educations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1996. Vol. 1, № 1. P. 95–123. (Translated from English)
14. Papert S. 1981, Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books. 242 р. (Translated from English)
15. Report of a Workshop on the Scope and Nature of Computational Thinking. Committee for the Workshops on Computational Thinking; National Research Council. 2010. The National Academic Press. 2010. 115 р. Available at: http://nap.edu/12840. (Translated from English)
16. Wing J. Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 2006. March 2006. Vol. 49, № 3. P. 33–35. (Translated from English)
17. Wing J. Research Notebook: Computational Thinking – What and Why? / The Link. The magazine of the Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science. 2011–03–06. Available at: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/link/research-notebook-computational-thinking-what-and-why. (Translated from English)
Review
For citations:
Khenner E.K. COMPUTATIONAL THINKING. The Education and science journal. 2016;(2):18-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-2-18-33