EVELOPMENT OF EDUCATIONAL SPECIALIST’S CREATIVITY IN THE PROCESS OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-5-107-122
Abstract
The aim of the article is to present creativity in the process of pedagogical conflict resolution. The results of psychological research conducted among secondary school teachers are given.
The article summarizes the results of the study of personality and creativity highlighted its main components. Methods. The methods involve theoretical analysis of the problem and the subject of investigation, philosophical, psychological, pedagogical, sociological literature research; empirical methods (school teacher’s psychological testing by means of hand-picked procedures); methods stimulating educational specialists to take initiative in the process of conflict situations› constructive resolution (training methods group discussion, role-playing and business games, specific situations analysis); quantitative and qualitative analysis of empirical results (computer data processing, data design in the form of tables, schemes, illustrations, diagrams, bar charts), methods of mathematical statistics (The Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient, φ-Fisher). Data processing procedure is actualized by means of MS Excel package and statistical manipulation program «Statistica 8.0».
Results and scientific novelty. The scientific belief of the following concepts content is concretized: «educational specialist’s creativity in the process of conflict resolution», «pedagogical conflict»; psycho-pedagogical conditions of creativity development in the process of conflict resolution are determined. Personal and behavioral features of various creativity level pedagogues are elicited. The correlation of educational specialist’s creativity with peculiarities of their behavior in conflict situations is revealed. It is stated that creativity appears to be one of the determinant of individual’s action, which is oriented on constructive conflict resolution. The program schemed by us promoted the extension of the teachers creative potential, which, in return, promoted upgrading of unusual mentality and creative approach to problem situations solution, which gives an opportunity to resolute pedagogical conflicts constructively.
The program of educational specialist’s creative development in the process of conflict resolution is elaborated and tested. The interconnection of creativity, personal and behavioral peculiarities of educational workers in the process of conflict resolution is elicited. The research concludes in educational specialist’s creative development program elaboration in the process of conflict resolution, which promotes the pedagogues’ personal growth, enhancement of professional activity, increase of theoretical and practical background of the teachers for solving conflict situations.
Practical significance. Research results may be applied in psychological consulting, in pedagogues’ and psychologists’ teaching or advanced training. The program of educational specialist’s creative development elaboration in the process of conflict resolution may be exercised in psychological educational service functioning.
About the Author
Darya N. SergeevaRussian Federation
PhD. Student, Department of Educational Psychology and Developmental Psychology, Bashkir State Pedagogical University, Ufa (RF).
References
1. Barysheva T. A., Zhigalov Ju. A. Psihologo-pedagogicheskie osnovy razvitija kreativnosti. [Psychology and pedagogical bases of development of creativity]. St.-Petersburg: Publishing House Piter. 2006. 268 р. (In Russian)
2. Bogojavlenskaja D. B. Psihologija tvorcheskih sposobnostej. [Psychology of creative abilities]. Moscow: Publishing House Piter.Fedorov, 2009. 416 p. (In Russian)
3. Golovanova A. A. Kommunikativnaja kreativnost' sub’ekta kak faktor jeffektivnosti gruppovogo reshenija zadach.] Communicative creativity of the subject as factor of efficiency of the group solution of tasks]. Cand. diss. Kazan, 2003. 147 p. (In Russian)
4. Grecov A. G. Trening kreativnosti dlja starsheklassnikov i studentov. [Training of creativity for seniors and students]. St.-Petersburg: Publishing House Piter, 2007. 208 p. (In Russian)
5. Dmitriyeva L. G. Dialogicheskiy podhod k formirovaniyu psychologicheskoy gotovnosti budushego uchitelya k subject-subjectnomu vzaimodeystviyu. [Dialogue approach to formation of psychological readiness of future teacher to the subject – subject to pedagogical interaction]. Cand. diss. Samara, 2011. 473 p. (In Russian)
6. Kann S. Ju. Izuchenie vzaimosvjazi kreativnosti obshhenija i kreativnosti myshlenija studentov. [Studying of interrelation of creativity of communication and creativity of thinking of students]. Abstract of cand. diss. Ryazan, 1998. 22 p. (In Russian)
7. Morozov A. V., Chernelevskij D. Kreativnaja pedagogika i psihologija. [Creative pedagogics and psychology]. Moscow: Publishing House Akademicheskij proekt. [Academic Project]. 2004. 560 p. (In Russian)
8. Osipova T. Ju. Psihologicheskie uslovija razvitija kommunikativnoj kreativnosti u studentov tehnicheskogo vuza. [Psychological conditions of development of communicative creativity in students of technical college]. Cand. diss. Tomsk, 2000. 187 p. (In Russian)
9. Ponomarev Ja. A. Creativity psychology: prospects of development. Psihologicheskij zhurnal. [Psychological Journal]. 1994. No 6. P. 38–50. (In Russian)
10. Potashnik M. M. Kak razvivat' pedagogicheskoe tvorchestvo. [How to develop pedagogical creativity]. Moscow: Publishing House Znanie. [Knowledge]. 1987. 80 p. (In Russian)
11. Sergeeva D. N. Professional development of the teacher in resolution of conflicts by means of creativity. Akmeologija. [Acmeology]. 2015. No 3 (55). P. 149– 152. (In Russian)
12. Holodnaja M. A. Psihologija intellekta. Paradoksy issledovanija. [Psikhologiya of intelligence. Paradoxes of research]. St.-Petersburg: Publishing House Piter, 2002. 272 p. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Sergeeva D.N. EVELOPMENT OF EDUCATIONAL SPECIALIST’S CREATIVITY IN THE PROCESS OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION. The Education and science journal. 2016;(5):107-122. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-5-107-122