THE FORMS OF EDUCATIONAL COOPERATION IN SCHOOL UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FEDERAL STATE EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-9-26-42
Abstract
The aim of the publication is to show possibilities of implementation of requirements of the federal state educational standard (FSES) for formati on of the universal educational activities (UEA) during group work at lessons at comprehensive school.
Methods. Theoretical methods involve analysis, comparison and generalization
methods; empirical method of interview.
Results. The main components of learning technology in cooperation and stages of technological process of group work are presented. The features of the formation of small groups are described due to the criteria of duration of a group work and the age of pupils. The possible options for the role structure of discussion groups and ways of distribution of social roles in groups are found out. The authors show the main steps of the process of group work process and organization techniques of group work of students at different stages of the lesson that allow purposefully organize the situation of communication and reflective activities. Scientific novelty. The essence of an educational cooperation as forms of group interaction of the teacher and pupils at a lesson is considered in the context of FSES of the last generation. The emergent problems in the course of the group activities organization at school are disclosed. The authors propose their own opinion on the implementation of the basic stages of group work, which are defined as a technological lesson plan. In addition, the components of a technological lesson plan include the universal learning activities forming during group
activities which are important for the implementation of FSES requirements.
Practical significance. The proposed techniques for organizing group work of pupils at different stages of the lesson and a technological lesson plan describing the universal learning activities allow teachers to effectively use technology of cooperation in education, aimed at the formation of pupils’ communicative learning activities.
Methods. Theoretical methods involve analysis, comparison and generalization
methods; empirical method of interview.
Results. The main components of learning technology in cooperation and stages of technological process of group work are presented. The features of the formation of small groups are described due to the criteria of duration of a group work and the age of pupils. The possible options for the role structure of discussion groups and ways of distribution of social roles in groups are found out. The authors show the main steps of the process of group work process and organization techniques of group work of students at different stages of the lesson that allow purposefully organize the situation of communication and reflective activities. Scientific novelty. The essence of an educational cooperation as forms of group interaction of the teacher and pupils at a lesson is considered in the context of FSES of the last generation. The emergent problems in the course of the group activities organization at school are disclosed. The authors propose their own opinion on the implementation of the basic stages of group work, which are defined as a technological lesson plan. In addition, the components of a technological lesson plan include the universal learning activities forming during group
activities which are important for the implementation of FSES requirements.
Practical significance. The proposed techniques for organizing group work of pupils at different stages of the lesson and a technological lesson plan describing the universal learning activities allow teachers to effectively use technology of cooperation in education, aimed at the formation of pupils’ communicative learning activities.
About the Authors
L. G. Puzep
Branch of Omsk State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Psychology and Special (Defectological) Education
Russian Federation
Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Psychology and Special (Defectological) Education
Yu. A. Tereshchenko
Branch of Omsk State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Psychology and Special (Defectological) Education
Russian Federation
Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Psychology and Special (Defectological) Education
References
1. Abramova G. S. Vozrastnaya psihologiya. [Age-related psychology]. Rostov-on-Don: Publishing House Feniks, 2010. 568 p. (In Russian)
2. Belbin R. M. «Komandnye roli»: klassifikacija rolej v gruppe. [Team roles: Classification of the roles in a group]. Available at: http://psycabi.net/testy/674-test-r-m-belbina-komandnye-roli-klassifikatsiya-rolej-v-gruppe. (In Russian)
3. Bukatov V. M. Pedagogicheskie tainstva didakticheskih igr. [Pedagogical sacraments of didactic games]. Moscow: Publishing House Flinta, 1997. 96 p. (In Russian)
4. Vodyakha S. A., Vodyakha Y. E. Creativity of senior secondary school children as a predictor of the school psychological well-being. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii. [Pedagogical Education in Russia]. 2015. № 6. P. 90–94. (In Russian)
5. Voloshina V. P. Uchebnoe sotrudnichestvo kak osnova formirovanija u shkol’nikov umenija i zhelanija uchit’sja. [Educational cooperation as the basis of formation of students’ skills and willingness to learn]. Available at: http://festival. 1september.ru/articles/414455/. (In Russian)
6. Dusavickij A. K., Kondratjuk E. M., Tolmacheva I. N., Shilkunova Z. I. Urok v nachal’noj shkole. Realizaciya sistemno-deyatel’nostnogo podhoda k obucheniyu. [Lesson in elementary school. Implementation of system-activity approach to learning]. Moscow: Publishing House Vita-Press, 2011. 288 p. (In Russian)
7. Zair-Bek E. S. Osnovy pedagogicheskogo proektirovaniya. [Basics of pedagogical design]. Saint-Petersburg: Publishing House Prosveshhenie. [Enlightenment]. 1994. 234 p. (In Russian)
8. Zapyataya O. V. Diagnostika sformirovannosti kommunikativnyh uchebnyh dejstvij u uchashchihsya 5–7 klassov. [Diagnostics of formation of communicative learning activities at pupils of 5–7 classes]. Volgograd: Publishing House Uchitel’. [Teacher]. 2014. 71 p. (In Russian)
9. Isaev E. I., Slobodchikov V. I. Psihologiya obrazovaniya cheloveka: Stanovlenie sub”ektnosti v obrazovatel’nyh processah. [Psychology of human formation: The formation of subjectivity in educational processes]. Moscow: Pravoslavnyj Svjato-Tihonovskij gumanitarnyj universitet. [Saint Tikhon’s Orthodox University]. 2014. 432 p. (In Russian)
10. Kak proektirovat’ universal’nye uchebnye dejstviya v nachal’noj shkole. Ot dejstviya k mysli. [How to design universal educational activities in elementary school. From action to thought]. Ed. by A. G. Asmolov. Moscow Publishing House Prosveshhenie. [Enlightenment]. 2010, 152 p. (In Russian)
11. Karpova E. V., Shevko O. N. Organization of the work of pupils in small groups in system of D. B. Elkonin – V. V. Davydov developing training. Yaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik. [Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin]. 2005. P. 65–70. (In Russian)
12. Klarin M. V. Didakticheskie igry. [Didactic games]. Rossijskaja pedagogicheskaja jenciklopedija. [Russian Pedagogical Encyclopedia]. V. 2. Moscow: Bol’shaja Rossijskaja jenciklopedija. [Great Russian Encyclopedia]. 1993. P. 269–271. (In Russian)
13. Kopoteva G. L. Didaktika uverennosti v sebe: proektiruem urok, realizuyushchij trebovaniya FGOS. Osnovnoe obshchee obrazovanie. [Didactics confidence: Design class that implements the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard. Basic education]. Volgograd: Publishing House Uchitel’. [Teacher]. 2016. 143 p. (In Russian)
14. Malyavina S. V., Shestakov V. V. Organization of group activities in the classroom of a foreign language in the form of The Survival Tournament. «Aktual’nye zadachi pedagogiki»: materialy VI mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (g. Chita, yanvar’ 2015 g.). [Actual Problems of Pedagogy: the 6th International Scientific Conference, Chita, January 2015]. Chita: Publishing House Molodoj uchenyj. [Young Scientist]. 2015. Р. 172–174 (In Russian).
15. Matyash N. V., Pavlova T. A. Metody aktivnogo social’no-psihologicheskogo obucheniya. [Methods of active socio-psychological training]. Moscow: Publishing House Akademija. [Academy]. 2010. 96 p. (In Russian)
16. Morokova N. V., Stan Y. Y., Pryn E. I. Metodicheskie rekomendacii dlja uchitelej nachal’nyh klassov po realizacii dejatel’nostnogo metoda obuchenija v ramkah FGOS NOO. [Methodical recommendations for primary school teachers for the implementation of the activity of the method of learning within the the Federal State Educational Standard in primary basic education]. Available at: http://iro23.ru/sites/default/files/sistemno-deyatelnostnyy_podhod_v_obuchenii_didakticheskie_principy.pdf. (In Russian)
17. Pedagogicheskaya psihologiya. [Pedagogical psychology]. Ed. by V. A. Guruzhapov. Moscow: Publishing House Jurajt, 2014. 493 p. (In Russian)
18. Pidkasistyj P. I., Hajdarov Zh. S. Tekhnologiya igry v obuchenii i razvitii. [Game technology in learning and development]. Moscow: Moskovskij pedagogicheskij universitet. [Moscow Pedagogical University]. 1996. 270 p. (In Russian)
19. Sovremennye obrazovatel’nye tekhnologii. [Modern educational technology]. Ed. b N. V. Bordovskaya. Moscow: KNORUS 2011. 432 p. (In Russian)
20. Тсukerman G. A. Kak mladshie shkol’niki uchatsya uchit’sya? [How do junior schoolchildren learn to learn?]. Moscow; Riga: Publishing House Jeksperiment. [Experiment]. 2000. 222 p. (In Russian)
21. Shtroo V. A. Metody aktivnogo social’no-psihologicheskogo obucheniya. [Methods of active socio-psychological training]. Moscow: Publishing House Jurajt, 2015. 277 p. (In Russian)
22. Kunanbayeva M. S. Criteria for Formation of Active Personal Position of Schoolchildren. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 2016. № 11 (13). Р. 5883–5891. (Translated from English)
23. Slambekova T. S., Ibragimkyzy S., Saylaubay Y. E., Albytova N. Problems of Pedagogical Creativity Development. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 2016. № 11 (12). Р. 5290–5298. (Translated from English)
Review
For citations:
Puzep L.G., Tereshchenko Yu.A. THE FORMS OF EDUCATIONAL COOPERATION IN SCHOOL UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FEDERAL STATE EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS. The Education and science journal. 2016;(9):26-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-9-26-42
Views:
2106
Email this article 