THE QUALITY OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS IN THE UNIVERSITY THROUGH STUDENTS’ EYES
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-9-43-61
Abstract
The aim of the article is to describe and analyse the basic requirements and expectations of consumers of educational services, which the educationa
organization during the planning and implementation of the activities should
be guided by.
Methods. The methods involve theoretical and empirical data collection, methods of mathematical statistics, methods of descriptive statistics; analysis of legislative and regulatory documents; comparison and synthesis of the findings of research scientists on the quality of an educational process; psycho-pedagogical observation, uestionnaire study; studying of experience of a quality evaluation of the services provided by higher educational organizations on the part of consumers.
Results and scientific novelty. The definitions of the concepts of «quality of higher education» and «consumer monitoring» are given. The most significant trends of consumer monitoring are considered: monitoring of indicators related to external consumers (applicants, students, parents, employers); monitoring of a teaching quality and indicators that reflect the level of development by students of educational programs. The questionnaire for studying of real degree of a consumer satisfaction
(students) by quality of educational services at the Russian Vocational Pedagogical University is worked out and approved. The results of the questionnaire are presented. 1–4 year students of full-time education at the Russian Vocational PedagogicalUniversity, in total – 36 groups take part in the questionnaire. The amount
of selection – 575 respondents; information data processing was performed using methods of the content analysis and correlation analysis Practical significance. The conducted research allowed us to concretize the requirements and consumer expectations of educational services, to develop and implement a road map aimed at improving the quality of university education services.
organization during the planning and implementation of the activities should
be guided by.
Methods. The methods involve theoretical and empirical data collection, methods of mathematical statistics, methods of descriptive statistics; analysis of legislative and regulatory documents; comparison and synthesis of the findings of research scientists on the quality of an educational process; psycho-pedagogical observation, uestionnaire study; studying of experience of a quality evaluation of the services provided by higher educational organizations on the part of consumers.
Results and scientific novelty. The definitions of the concepts of «quality of higher education» and «consumer monitoring» are given. The most significant trends of consumer monitoring are considered: monitoring of indicators related to external consumers (applicants, students, parents, employers); monitoring of a teaching quality and indicators that reflect the level of development by students of educational programs. The questionnaire for studying of real degree of a consumer satisfaction
(students) by quality of educational services at the Russian Vocational Pedagogical University is worked out and approved. The results of the questionnaire are presented. 1–4 year students of full-time education at the Russian Vocational PedagogicalUniversity, in total – 36 groups take part in the questionnaire. The amount
of selection – 575 respondents; information data processing was performed using methods of the content analysis and correlation analysis Practical significance. The conducted research allowed us to concretize the requirements and consumer expectations of educational services, to develop and implement a road map aimed at improving the quality of university education services.
About the Authors
S. S. Kotova
Institute of Psychological and Pedagogical Education, Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor
Russian Federation
Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor
I. I. Hasanova
Institute of Psychological and Pedagogical Education, Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor
Russian Federation
Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor
References
1. Belova S. N. Quality management of the educational process in the University on the basis of monitoring of satisfaction of consumers of educational services. Standarty i monitoring v obrazovanii. [Standards and Monitoring in Education]. 2008. № 1. P. 23–29. (In Russian)
2. Belonozhko M. L., Barbakov O. M., Frolov Yu. S. the Quality of training of University graduates for oil and gas complex of Russia. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija. [Modern Problems of Science and Education]. 2013. № 6. P. 984. (In Russian)
3. Bonushko H. A., Semchenko A. A. Comparative analysis of models of quality systems used at Russian universities. Omskij nauchnyj vestnik. Serija «Obshhestvo. Istorija. Sovremennost’». [Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series «Society. History. Modernity»]. 2014. № 3 (129). P. 31–35. (In Russian)
4. Golikov N. Social effects of education: realities, projections, perspectives. Teorija i praktika obshhestvennogo razvitija. [Theory and Practice of Social Development]. 2012. № 11. P. 73–79. (In Russian)
5. GOST ISO 9000:2015. [All Union State standard ISO 9000:2015]. Mezhgosudarstvennyj standart «Sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva. Osnovnye polozhenija i slovar’». [International standard «quality management System. Basic provisions and vocabulary»]. Moscow: Publishing House STANDARTINFORM, 2015. 49 p.(In Russian)
6. Efimova I. A. Improving the quality of higher education in the Russian Federation. Rossijskoe predprinimatel’stvo. [Russian Entrepreneurship]. 2011. № 5. Vol. 1 (183). P. 151–154. (In Russian)
7. Kachalov V. A. Problems of quality management in higher education institutions. Standarty i kachestvo. [Standards and Quality]. 2005. № 12. P. 82–87. (In Russian)
8. Nikitina N. Sh., Valeev M. A., Shcheglov P. E. Education quality management. System approach. Sistemy upravlenija kachestvom: proektirovanie, organizacija, metodologija: materialy H simpoziuma «Kvalimetrija cheloveka i obrazovanija: metodologija i praktika». [System of Quality Management: Design, Organization, Methodology: Proceedings of the 10th Symposium «Human Qualimetry and Education: Methodology and Practice»]. Book 4. Ed. by N. А. Selezneva and A. I. Subetto. Moscow: Issledovatel’skij centr problem kachestva podgotovki specialistov. [Research Center of Quality Problems of Specialists Training]. 2002. P. 17–29. (In Russian)
9. Ocenka kachestva professional’nogo obrazovanija. [Evaluation of quality of professional education]. Doklad 5, maj 2001. [Report, d.d. 5 May, 2001]. Ed. by V. I. Bajdenko, John. van Zantvoort. Moscow: Issledovatel’skij centr problem kachestva podgotovki specialistov. [Research Center of Quality Problems of Specialists Training]. 2001. 186 p. (In Russian)
10. Plotnikov L. D., Chikova O. M. Convergence of personal properties of students and rating assessment of knowledge in higher education institution of a pedagogical orientation. Teorija i praktika obshhestvennogo razvitija. [Theory and Practice of Social Development]. 2014. № 15. P. 59–62. (In Russian)
11. Semchenko A. A. Organizational-economic principles of formation of the global market of educational services. Nauchnoe obozrenie. [Scientific Review]. 2014. № 3. Р. 196–201. (In Russian)
12. Upravlenie v vysshej shkole: opyt, tendencii, perspektivy. [Management in higher education: experience, trends, perspectives]. Moscow: Publishing House Logos, 2005. 541 p. (In Russian)
13. Fenomenologija obrazovanija: ot problem k reshenijam. [Phenomenology of education: from problems to solutions]. Ed. by L. M. Fedoryak. Saint-Petersburg: Institut zemnogo magnetizma, ionosfery i rasprostranenija radiovoln im. N. V. Pushkova. [Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Distribution of Radio Waves named after N. V. Pushkov]. 2011. 298 p. (In Russian)
14. Chikova O. M. Psychological readiness for training of students-bachelors of the University, the pedagogical orientation of the. Teorija i praktika ob shhestvennogo razvitija. [Theory and Practice of Social Development]. 2014. № 18. P. 202–204. (In Russian)
15. Barnet R. Improving higher education: total quality care // SRHE and Open University Press. 1992.
16. Fedorov V. A., Tretyakova N. V. Quality management of educational institutions in protecting students’ health: conceptual and structural-functional innovations // Scientific Bulletin of National Mining University. 2015. № 6 (150). P. 134–143.
17. Geodegebuure L. C. J., Maassen P. A. M., Westerheijden D. F. Quality assessment in higher education. Peer review and performance indicators: quality assessment in British and Dutch higher education /eds.: Leo C. J. Geodegebuure, Peter A. M. Maassen, Don F. Westerheijden. Utrecht: Lemma. P. 29.
18. Jacobsson P. A plea for more consistent definition of quality in education and research. Quality and communication for improvement: proceedings 12th European AIR Forum, Universitй Claude Bernard Ecole Normale Supйrieure Lyon, France, September 9–12, 1990. Enschede: EAIR, a European Higher Education Society; Utrecht: Lemma. P. 59–84.
19. Kamalova L. A., Raykova E. The Quality and Criteria of Evaluation of Educational Work at the Universities of Russia at the Contemporary Stage. IEJME – Mathematics Education. 2016. № 11 (1). P. 71–79.
20. Krokhina J. A., Aleksandrova N. A., Buldakova N. V. Monitoring Technology: the Qualimetric Foundations of the Educational Process of the University. The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (IJESE). 2016. № 11 (14). P. 7215–7225.
21. Simonova M. V., Ilyukhina L. A., Romantsev G. M., Zeer E. F., Khamatnurov F. T. Approaches to Monitoring of Competences and Qualifications. IEJME – Mathematics Education. 2016. № 11 (7). P. 2745–2760.
22. Westerheijden D. F. Peers, performance and power: quality assessment in the Netherlands. Peer review and performance indicators: quality assessment in British and Dutch higher education. Utrecht: Lemma. P. 183–207.
23. Westerheijden D. F. Systems of quality assessment in European higher education: paper presented to the 4-th EAIE Conference, Berlin, 5–7 November. 1992.
Review
For citations:
Kotova S.S., Hasanova I.I. THE QUALITY OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS IN THE UNIVERSITY THROUGH STUDENTS’ EYES. The Education and science journal. 2016;(9):43-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-9-43-61
Views:
1522
Email this article 