PHILOSOPHY AS AN ART OF DYING AND THE SCIENCE OF LIFE: REMEMBERING S. Z. GONCHAROV
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-9-80-89
Abstract
The aim of the publication is the analysis of creative heritage of the prominent Ekaterinburg philosopher, Doctor of Philosophy, professor, over many years head of the Department of Philosophy, Culturology and Art Criticism of the Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University – Sergey Zakharovich Goncharov (1/25/1946 – 2/12/2016).
Method of the analytical research stated in the publication is hermeneutical. Results and scientific novelty. The review of the fundamental ideas of S. Z. Goncharov is presented; the first attempt to estimate the scientist’s contribution to contemporary Russian philosophy is made. The most significant biographic and personal factors which have affected a career and evolution of outlook of S. Z. Goncharov are highlighted. The qualification of Goncharov’s philosophical concept as the modern version of Platonism
which has incorporated two traditional lines (extremely important for Russia) of development of a philosophical thought is offered: firstly, from Plato through Hegel to Marx and E. Ilyenkov, and, secondly, from Plato through Hegel to I. Ilyin and orthodox patristic heritage. S. Z. Goncharov’s positions of situation, major for understanding, from his scientific publications are given. The nonreducing of outlook of S. Z. Goncharov to his articulated component is emphasized. The openness, tendency to communication with the original, looking for interlocutors, careful attitude to otherness of opponents, a presumption of subjectivity of any person as to an existential dominant in S. Z. Goncharov’s mental outlook are noted. Fruitfulness of works updating by S. Z. Goncharov is noted. The works by S. Z. Goncharov have already received wide ecognition not only in Russia and the countries entering the USSR, but also in China, Japan, etc. Practical significance. The author hopes for further mutual cooperation of a
wide range of researchers for deeper judgment of philosophical creativity of S. Z. Goncharov, his contemporaries and their predecessors – for establishment of correlation of persons and eras that S. Z. Goncharov called «joint making» and considered it as the most organic for a person – a truly creative state of being.
Method of the analytical research stated in the publication is hermeneutical. Results and scientific novelty. The review of the fundamental ideas of S. Z. Goncharov is presented; the first attempt to estimate the scientist’s contribution to contemporary Russian philosophy is made. The most significant biographic and personal factors which have affected a career and evolution of outlook of S. Z. Goncharov are highlighted. The qualification of Goncharov’s philosophical concept as the modern version of Platonism
which has incorporated two traditional lines (extremely important for Russia) of development of a philosophical thought is offered: firstly, from Plato through Hegel to Marx and E. Ilyenkov, and, secondly, from Plato through Hegel to I. Ilyin and orthodox patristic heritage. S. Z. Goncharov’s positions of situation, major for understanding, from his scientific publications are given. The nonreducing of outlook of S. Z. Goncharov to his articulated component is emphasized. The openness, tendency to communication with the original, looking for interlocutors, careful attitude to otherness of opponents, a presumption of subjectivity of any person as to an existential dominant in S. Z. Goncharov’s mental outlook are noted. Fruitfulness of works updating by S. Z. Goncharov is noted. The works by S. Z. Goncharov have already received wide ecognition not only in Russia and the countries entering the USSR, but also in China, Japan, etc. Practical significance. The author hopes for further mutual cooperation of a
wide range of researchers for deeper judgment of philosophical creativity of S. Z. Goncharov, his contemporaries and their predecessors – for establishment of correlation of persons and eras that S. Z. Goncharov called «joint making» and considered it as the most organic for a person – a truly creative state of being.
About the Author
A. G. Kislov
Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor, Department of Law
Russian Federation
Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor, Department of Law
References
1. Goncharov S. Z. Trud i obrasovanije na puty k kreativnomu obszhestvu.[Work and education towards a creative society]. Yekaterinburg, 2014. 445 p.(In Russian)
2. Goncharov S. Z. Culture – creative basis education. Obrazovanije i nauka.[Education and Science]. 2014. № 2 (111). P. 73–84. (In Russian)
3. Goncharov S. Z. Russia needs a subjective philosophy. Obrazovanije i nauka. [Education and Science]. 2012. № 6 (95). P. 93–106. (In Russian)
4. Iljenkov E. V. Ob idolah i idealah. [On the idols and ideals]. Moscow: Publishing House Politizdat, 1968. 312 p. (In Russian)
5. Iljin I. A. Axiomy religioznogo opyta. [Axioms of religious experience]. Moscow: Publishing House Russkaja kniga. [Russian Book]. 1993. V. 1. 496 p. (In Russian)
6. Loyfman I. Y. Mirovozzrencheskije shtudiy: izbrannyje raboty. [Ideological sketches: Selected works]. Yekaterinburg: Bank kul’turnoj informacii. [Bank of Cultural Information]. 2002. 110 p. (In Russian)
7. Platon. Sobr. soch. v 4-h t. T. 2. [Plato. Collected works: in 4 volumes. V. 2]. Moscow: Publishing House Mysl’. [Thought]. 1993. 528 p. (In Russian)
8.
Review
For citations:
Kislov A.G. PHILOSOPHY AS AN ART OF DYING AND THE SCIENCE OF LIFE: REMEMBERING S. Z. GONCHAROV. The Education and science journal. 2016;(9):80-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-9-80-89
Views:
1382
Email this article 