RESULTS OF THE UNIFIED STATE EXAM: EXPERIENCE OF INTERREGIONAL COMPARISONS
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-10-11-38
Abstract
Abstract. The aim of the presented article is the search for the factors that determine the results of the Unified State Exam (USE) in the Russian regions through the example of mathematics exam in 2013.
Methods. During the study of the exam results the authors applied the methodology of complex research, including methods of comparative and statistical analysis of published data on the results of the exam by Federal Center of Testing and Federal Institute for Education Measurement.
Results and scientific novelty. It was found that the exam results in the region depend not only on the level of students’ training, but on the quality of test materials and the discipline of the test procedures.
Practical significance. The authors suggest that the findings of this study will contribute to the improvement of techniques and technologies of the exam.
About the Authors
Liutsiya M. Nurieva
Omsk State Pedagogical University, Omsk
Russian Federation
Candidate of Pedagogic Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics and Methods of Mathematics Teaching
Russian Federation
Candidate of Pedagogic Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics and Methods of Mathematics Teaching
Sergey G. Kiselev
Omsk State Pedagogical University, Omsk
Russian Federation
Sociologist, Center for the Adaptation and Employment of Graduates and Students
Russian Federation
Sociologist, Center for the Adaptation and Employment of Graduates and Students
References
1. Agranovich M. L., Zair-Bek S. I., Kogan E. Ja., Kogevnikova O. N., Majorov A. N., Mitrofanov K. G. i dr. Metodicheskie rekomendacii po primeneniju sistemy pokazatelej i indikatorov dlja upravlenija kachestvom obrazovanija na regional’nom i municipal’nom urovnjah. [Methodical recommendations about use of system of measures and indicators for quality management of education at the regional and municipal levels]. Available at: http://window.edu.ru/catalog/ pdf2txt/050/79050/59754? p_page=1. (In Russian)
2. Alyabyeva E. Tens of thousands of graduates just won the result in «lottery». Available at: https://slon.ru/economics/desyatki_ tysyach_vypusknikov_prosto_vyigryvali_svoy_rezultat_v_lotereyu_-1097425.xhtml. (In Russian)
3. Bochenkov S. A. Analysis and interpretation of results of USE-2012. Upravlenie obrazovaniem: teorija i praktika. [Management of Education: Theory and Practice]. 2012. № 3. P. 9–35. Available at: http://www.iuorao.ru/images/jurnal/12_3/bochenkov.pdf. (In Russian)
4. Ivanov A. V. EGJe v shkolah – instrument degradacii dlja Rossii. [USE at schools – the instrument of degradation for Russia]. Available at: https:// www.youtube.com/watch? v= z4MAbshKIJk. (In Russian)
5. Itogovyj analiticheskij otchet o rezul’tatah provedenija EGJe v 2010 godu (maj-ijun’ 2010 goda). [The closing analytical report about results of holding the USE in 2010 (May-June, 2010)]. Moscow, 2010. Available at: http://fipi.ru/sites/default/files/document/14080028/1_razdel_11_21092010.pdf. (In Russian)
6. Kiselev S. G., Nurieva L. M. USE results: experience of the analysis. P. 1. Rektor vuza. [Rector of Higher Education Institution]. 2013. № 5. P. 42–53. (In Russian)
7. Kiselev S. G., Nurieva L. M. USE results: experience of the analysis. P. 2. Rektor vuza. [Rector of Higher Education Institution]. 2013. № 6. P. 44–52. (In Russian)
8. Kiselev S. G., Nurieva L. M. To a problem of the analysis of results of the Unified state exam. Rektor vuza. [Rector of Higher Education Institution]. 2010. № 3. P. 38–44. (In Russian)
9. Kompleksnoe issledovanie uslovij zhizni naselenija. Statisticheskij sbornik – 2011. [Complex research of living conditions of the population. The statistical collection – 2011]. Moscow, 2013. P. 316. (In Russian)
10. Livanov D. V. EGJe priblizhaetsja k jekzamenam «kak v SSSR»: interv’ju gazete «Komsomol’skaja pravda» 1 dekabrja 2015 goda. [USE approaches the exams «as in the USSR»: interview to the newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda, d.d. 1.12.2015]. Available at: http://minobrnauki.rf/%D1%81/%D0%BD%D0% BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%81% D1%82%D0%B8/7019. (In Russian)
11. Ogloblin A. V. Tret’ ballov EGJe po matematike 2013 goda – fal’sifikacija? [A third of marks in the Unified State Examination on mathematics of 2013 – falsification?]. Available at: https://slon.ru/economics/ tret_ballov_ege_po_matematike_2013_goda_falsifikatsiya-1102925.xhtml. (In Russian)
12. Otkrytye dannye Ministerstva obrazovanija i nauki Rossijskoj Federacii Svedenija o sdache Edinogo gosudarstvennogo jekzamena. [Open data of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation]. Available at: http://otkrytye-dannye.minobrnauki.rf/opendata/ 7710539135-ege. (In Russian)
13. Popov P. L., Saraev V. G. Results of the USE in subjects of the Russian Federation: communications with the social and economic and world outlook phenomena. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija. [Modern Problems of Science and Education]. 2015. № 2 (2). P. 590–598. (In Russian)
14. Predvaritel’nye itogi EGJe – 2013. [Preliminary results of USE-2013]. Available at: http://pressmia.ru/media/20130628/601819438.html. (In Russian)
15. Statistika EGJe. [USE statistics]. Oficial’nyj informacionnyj portal Edinogo gosudarstvennogo jekzamena. [Official information portal of the Unified state examination]. Available at: http://ege.edu.ru/ru/main/ satistics-ege/. (In Russian)
16. Statistika rezul’tatov EGJe v 2013 godu v regionah Rossii. [Statistics of results of the USE in 2013 in regions of Russia]. Available at: http://www.rustest.ru/ege/ statistics/results/. (In Russian)
17. Shmal’ko S. P. USE and vocational guidance of the entrant. Teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty sovremennoj nauki. [Theoretical and Application-Oriented Aspects of the Modern Science]. 2015. № 9 (4). P. 168–170. (In Russian)
18. Jakubov A. V. Nuzhna li matematika Chechne? [Whether the mathematics is necessary to Chechnya?]. Available at: http://www.schoolpress.ru/products/rubria/index.php?ID=72947&SECTION_ID=42. (In Russian)
19. Jashhenko I. V., Semenov A. V., Vysockij I. R. Metodicheskie rekomendacii po nekotorym aspektam sovershenstvovanija prepodavanija matematiki. [Methodical recommendations about some aspects of enhancement of teaching mathematics]. Moscow: FIPI, 2013. Available at: http://fipi.ru/ege-i-gve-11/analiticheskie-i-metodicheskie-materialy. (In Russian)
20. Khamatnurov F. T., Dudina M. M. & Chistik O. F. Psychological and Pedagogical Problems of Development of Talent Among Schoolchildren. IEJME-Mathematics Education. 2016. № 11 (8). Р. 2903–2913. (Translated from English)
Review
For citations:
Nurieva L.M., Kiselev S.G. RESULTS OF THE UNIFIED STATE EXAM: EXPERIENCE OF INTERREGIONAL COMPARISONS. The Education and science journal. 2016;(10):11-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-10-11-38
Views:
1114
Email this article 