CONSTRUCTING LESSONS ACCORDING TO FEDERAL STATE EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS (FSES)
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2017-5-55-71
Abstract
Introduction. Achievement of educational outcomes designated in the Federal State Educational Standards (FSES) of the system of general education is an urgent problem of public schools. The analysis of the existing guidelines of their realization in the course of the lesson shows that they are often declarative or imperative in nature, which makes it impossible for teachers to use them in their practical activity. What is changed is the rhetoric and terminology, but the essence remains the same, or the changes are hasty, premature and are implemented without taking into account the concrete situation. As a result, they do not lead to the accomplishment of the goal set in the new educational standards. The aims of the article consist in presenting a generalized practically realizable construct of a lesson which would provide the teacher with an algorithm of lesson planning in accordance with the goal of the Federal State Educational Standards. Methodology and research methods. The article offers analysis and synthesis of the normative documentation (Federal State Educational Standards), and of the content of scientific-methodological works and scientific publications dealing with practical lesson constructing. Results and scientific novelty. The article analyzes various lesson constructs suggested by theoretical and practical educationalists aimed at accomplishment of the goals designated in the Federal State Educational Standards. The authors come to the conclusion that in their practical activity, teachers often set inadequate lesson aims and thus fail to achieve the subject outcomes, which is in princi pal contrary to the systemic activity-oriented approach upon which these standards are based. The article describes a general algorithm of a lesson constructing which will allow the teacher to algorythmize and optimize the process of lesson preparation according to the requirements of the FSES of the system of general education. Practical significance. It is shown that such constructing makes it possible to achieve not only subject but also meta-subject and personal results.
About the Authors
A. P. Usol’tsev
Ural State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Theory and Methodology of Physics Education, Technology and Multimedia Didactic
Russian Federation
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Theory and Methodology of Physics Education, Technology and Multimedia Didactic
E. P. Antipova
Ural State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Management Economics
Russian Federation
Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Management Economics
References
1. Shemet B. I., Shemet O. B. The problems of implementing the Federal state educational standards related to the secondary vocational education. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2014. № 1 (1). Р. 17–27. DOI:10.17853/1994-5639-2014-1-17-27 (In Russian)
2. Bespal’ko V. P. Slagaemye pedagogicheskoy tekhnologii. [The Components of Pedagogical Technology]. Moscow: Publishing House Pedagogika, 1989. 192 p. (In Russian)
3. Osinina T. N. Lesson improvement in conditions of FSES realization. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo gumanitarnogo instituta. Seriya: Pedagogika i psikhologiya = Vestnik of the Moscow State Regional Humanitarian Institute. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology. 2015. Vol. 1. № 1. P. 12. (In Russian)
4. Gaponova N. M., Nurgaleeva I. R. FGOS: sushhnost’ ponjatija «konstrukt uroka», «tehnologicheskaja karta uroka». [FSES: the Essence of the Notions «Lesson Construct» and «Technological Chart of the Lesson»]. Available at: http://educontest. net/storage2/article/39629/1doc.docx (Accessed 05 November, 2016). (In Russian)
5. Voronina L. V. Conditions of formation research skills in the process of teaching mathematics. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii = Pedagogical Education in Russia. 2015. № 9. Р. 140–145. (In Russian)
6. Merzlyakova O. P. The role of educational environment in the development of active creative competence of pupils in teaching physics. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii = Pedagogical Education in Russia. 2015. № 5. Р. 76–81. (In Russian)
7. Nikolaev V. V. Technology Lesson Design on the Basis of the FSES. Obuchenie i vospitanie: metodika i praktika = Teaching and Education: Methods and Practice. 2013. № 7. P. 132–137. (In Russian)
8. Pechnikov A. N. Unified approach to the interpretation of competence in social management and education. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2016. № 2 (131). P. 4–18. DOI:10.17853/1994-5639-2016-2-4-18 (In Russian)
9. Usol’tsev A. P., Shamalo T. N. On the concept of «Engineering Thinking». Formirovanie inzhenernogo myshleniya v protsesse obucheniya: Sb. nauch. Trudov Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Formation of Engineering Thinking in Education Process: Collection of Scientific Works of the Ural State Pedagogical University. Ekaterinburg, 2015. P. 3–9. (In Russian)
10. Temnyatkina O. V. Technology Lesson Construct Design in accordance with Activity Components. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki = Modern Scientific Research and Investigation. 2016. № 4. P. 76–83. (In Russian)
11. Shamalo T. N. & Usol’tsev A. P. The Role of Visual Aids in Education. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii = Pedagogical Education in Russia. 2016. № 6. P. 102–109. (In Russian)
12. Vetokhina T. N. Modern Lesson in the Context of the FSES Realization. Novaya nauka: sovremennoe sostoyanie i puti razvitiya = New Science: Current State and Perspectives of Development. 2016. № 4. P. 54–56. (In Russian)
13. Latipova N. L. Construct of a Lesson in Technology as a Means of Organization of the Learning Process at School. Tekhnologicheskoe obrazovanie v shkole i vuze: Sbornik trudov konferentsii = Technological Education at Secondary and Higher School. Materials of the Conference. Yelabuga: EI(F)K(P)FU, 2016. P. 65–70. (In Russian)
14. Lipatnikova I. G. Modern approaches to the contents of mathematics education in the context of the dialogue of cultures. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii = Pedagogical Education in Russia. 2015. № 7. Р. 151–158. (In Russian)
15. Mamontova M. Y. Rating system for assessment of learining outcomes: model selection. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii = Pedagogical Education in Russia. 2015. № 7. Р. 91–98. (In Russian)
16. Moskitina E. V. Working Out a Physics Lesson Construct on the Basis of the FSES. Aktual’nye voprosy nauki, tekhniki i obrazovaniya: Trudy VIII regional’noy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii = Urgent Questions of Science, Technology and Education: Materials of the 8th Regional Scientific-Practical Conference. Novouralsk: NTI NIJaU MIFI, 2015. P. 155–167. (In Russian)
17. Frolov A. A. The Essence of General Education. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2015. № 3. P. 18–28. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Usol’tsev A.P., Antipova E.P. CONSTRUCTING LESSONS ACCORDING TO FEDERAL STATE EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS (FSES). The Education and science journal. 2017;19(5):55-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2017-5-55-71
Views:
1257
Email this article 