Shock digitalisation of education: The perception of participants of the educational process

Introduction. The relevance of the study is determined both by the importance of the problem of digital transformation of education in general, and by the specific conditions, which arose during the crisis caused by COVID-19. The long-termconsequences of the emergency transition of Russian education to the distance format, taking into account the ongoing pandemic, have yet to be assessed, but the reaction ofthe participants in the educational process to the first period of the total distance learning should be analysed immediately as a basis for future management decisions.

Aim. The aim of the present research is a comprehensive analysis of the perception of the experience of an emergency transition to a distant education format by the main participants in the educational process.

Methodology and research methods. Online survey based on Google forms was employed as the main method. The respondents to the survey included participants in the educational process, mostly permanently residing in the Sverdlovsk region (99% of the respondents). The survey was conducted in September – October 2020. The survey participation was voluntary and completely anonymous. As a result of the survey conducted, more than 24,500 original responses were received and processed. The data obtained were compared with the results of secondary studies (primarily, with the monitoring studies of the Higher School of Economics).

Results. The research findings demonstrate a number of significant shortcomings in the strategy of digital transformation of education, such as the insufficient development of the digital communication infrastructure in the regions, the technological and competence-based digital inequality, the lack of well-developed methods of using digitaleducational tools, the lack of high-quality content, the lack of full-fledged integrated educational resources on the market. The shortcomings mentioned above apparently led to a decrease in the quality of education during the period of self-isolation and provoked a reaction of rejection of digital educational forms and an increase in technological pessimism among a significant part of the respondents. The results are presented in correlation with secondary studies, which confirms the reliability of the general conclusions.

Scientific novelty. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the attraction, systematisation and analytical generalisation of original material on the urgent problem of digital transformation of education, collected in one of the largest and technologically advanced regions of the Russian Federation.

Practical significance. The current article makes it possible to more accurately assess the situation in regional education and provides reference points both for conducting longitudinal research and for making current and strategic management decisions in Russian education at the regional and federal level.

1. Polikarpov S. A., Semenov A. L. Mathematics for the 21st century school: The Russian experience and international prospects. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME-13) [Internet]; 2016; Hamburg. Ed. by Gabriele Kaiser. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG; 2017 [cited 2020 Oct 25]; p. 675–676. Available from: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319625966

2. Artyukhina A. I., Velikanov V. V., Velikanova O. F., Tretyak S. V., Chumakov V. I. Challenge of digital economy – digital transformation of education. In: European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS). International Conference on Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences (RPTSS 2018); 2018; Irkutsk. Vol. 50. Nicosia: Future Academy; 2018. p. 74–84. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2018.12.10

3. Kapur R., Byfield V., Del Frate F., Higgins M., Jagannathan S. The digital transformation of education. In: Mathieu P. P., Aubrecht C. (eds.). Earth observation open science and innovation [Internet]. ISSI Scientific Report Series. Vol. 15. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2018 [cited 2020 Oct 25]. p. 25–41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65633-5_2

4. Balkin J. M., Sonnevend J. The digital transformation of education. In: Greenhow C., Sonnevend J., Agur C. (eds.). Education and social media: Toward a digital future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2016. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262034470.001.0001

5. Pogorelova E. V., Efimova T. B. Digital transformation of education, science and innovations. In: Ashmarina S., Vochozka M., Mantulenko V. (eds.). Digital age: Chances, challenges and future [Internet]. ISCDTE 2019. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Vol. 84. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 25]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27015-5_7

6. Tarman B. The digital divide in education. In: International Conference for the History of Education, ISCHE XXV [Internet]; 2003 Jan [cited 2020 Oct 25]; p. 1–28. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/215593349_The_Digital_Divide_in_Education

7. Bilyalova A., Salimova D., Zelenina T. Digital transformation in education. In: Antipova T. (eds.). Integrated Science in Digital Age. [Internet] ICIS 2019. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Vol. 78. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 25]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22493-6_24

8. Balyer A., Öz Ö. Academicians’ views on digital transformation in education. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET) [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Oct 25]; 5 (4): 809–830. Available from: http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/441/295

9. Meiller Y. Digital transformation, covid-19 crisis, digital transformation. ESCP Impact Paper № 2020-36-EN. ESCP Business School; 2020. p. 1–9.

10. Giannakoulopoulos A., Limniati L. Rethinking the digital divide in education. In: EDULEARN18 Proceedings. 10th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies; 2018; Palma de Mallorca, Spain. p. 8862–8867. DOI: 10.21125/edulearn.2018.2072

11. Bannykh G., Kostina S. The digital divide in education as a challenge to the development of the territory. In: INTED2018 Proceedings. 12th International Technology, Education and Development Conference; 2018; Valencia; Spain. p. 3753– 3757. DOI: 10.21125/inted.2018.0726

12. Smyth G. Wireless technologies bridging the digital divide in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2020 Oct 25]; (1) 1. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26537054_Wireless_Technologies_Bridging_the_Digital_Divide_in_Education

13. Hartnett M. Digital divides. Oxford Bibliographies [Internet]. 2019 Aug 28 [cited 2020 Oct 25]. Available from: https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199756810/obo-9780199756810-0222.xml

14. Byrne J. Defeating the digital divide. Mount Royal Undergraduate Education Review [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 Oct 25]; 1 (3). Available from: https://mrujs.mtroyal.ca/index.php/mruer/article/view/312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/mruer312

15. Koroleva D. O., Adamovich K. A., Havenson T. E. The experience of Russian teachers in conducting distance learning. Informacionno-analiticheskie materialy Monitoringa jekonomiki obrazovanija po rezul’tatam statisticheskih i sociologicheskih obsledovanij = Information and Analytical Materials of the Monitoring of the Economics of Education Based on the Results of Statistical and Sociological Surveys [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 25]; 6. Available from: https://goo.su/2oFf (In Russ.)

16. Isaeva N. V., Kasprzhak A. G., Kobceva A. A., Catrjan M. A. School barometer. COVID-19: The situation with teaching and learning in Russian schools. Analiticheskij bjulleten’ NIU VShJe ob jekonomicheskih i social’nyh posledstvijah koronavirusa v Rossii i v mire = Analytical Bulletin of the National Research University Higher School of Economics on the Economic and Social Consequences of the Coronavirus in Russia and in the World [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 25]; 6: 92–109. Available from: https://www.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/373732979.pdf (In Russ.)

17. Havenson T. E., Kotik N. V., Koroleva D. O. Digital technological readiness of school teachers. Informacionno-analiticheskie materialy Monitoringa jekonomiki obrazovanija po rezul’tatam statisticheskih i sociologicheskih obsledovanij = Information and Analytical Materials of the Monitoring of the Economics of Education Based on the Results of Statistical and sociological Surveys [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 25]; 8. Available from: https://goo.su/2oaZ (In Russ.)

18. Mercalova T. A., Zair-Bek S. I., Anchikov K. M. Regional systems of general education in the context of the massive transition to distance learning. Informacionno-analiticheskie materialy Monitoringa jekonomiki obrazovanija po rezul’tatam statisticheskih i sociologicheskih obsledovanij = Information and Analytical Materials of the Monitoring of the Economics of Education Based on the Results of Statistical and Sociological Surveys [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 25]; 5. Available from: https://goo.su/2obe (In Russ.)

19. Pavlenko K. V. Availability of distance learning devices in families. Informacionno-analiticheskie materialy Monitoringa jekonomiki obrazovanija po rezul’tatam statisticheskih i sociologicheskih obsledovanij = Information and Analytical Materials of the Monitoring of the Economics of Education Based on the Results of Statistical and Sociological Surveys [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 25]; 9. Available from: https://goo.su/2ODI (In Russ.)

20. Nazarov V. L., Zherdev D. V. “BOL’ShAJa IGRA” v. 2.0: Rossija v global’nom informacionnom prostranstve = “BIG GAME” V. 2.0: Russia in the global information space. Ekaterinburg: Ural University Publishing House; 2018 [cited 2020 Oct 25]. 304 p. Available from: http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/66049 (In Russ.)