Inclusive educational process at the university: Theoretical and experimental model of teachers' psychological readiness

Introduction. The institutionalisation of inclusion in higher education determines new requirements for university teachers, what is also found in the field of psychological readiness for the implementation of the educational process with the participation of students with disabilities.

Aim. The present research was aimed to develop theoretical framework and experimental verification of the model of psychological readiness of academic teaching staff for the implementation of an inclusive educational process.

Methodology and research methods. Methodologically, the research was based on the idea that the true implementation of inclusive higher education is conditioned by the formation of an inclusive culture of university teachers, which serves as the foundation for the implementation of inclusive practices and policies and one of the immanent attributes of which is psychological readiness to implement the educational process with the participation of disabled students.

In the diagnostic and methodological terms, the current study relied on the authors' questionnaire containing the blocks of questions built using a 5-point Likert scale and characterising the severity of the various components of such readiness among university teachers in relation to working with disabled students of diverse nosological groups.

The survey results were analysed qualitatively and quantitatively using the Cronbach Alpha coefficient, Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Mann-Whitney tests, and the median test applying the Pearson test. To check the consistency of the proposed theoretical model of the psychological readiness of university teachers to implement an inclusive educational process, structural equation modelling (or SEM - the method of asymptotically non-parametric assessment) was employed. For statistical calculations, the program IBM SPSS Statistics ver.23 and the AMOS module were used.

Results. The integrative model of the psychological readiness of faculty for the implementation of an inclusive educational process has been theoretically substantiated and experimentally confirmed. This model includes a motivational-value component (the acceptance of the values of an inclusive culture, beliefs and attitudes of the teacher regarding inclusive education), an affective component (the emotional acceptance of the situation of inclusive education and its subjects) and an operational component (the teacher's assessment of own skills in using the tools of inclusive education). In the presented model, the teacher's methodical preparedness for teaching students with disabilities acts as a cognitive component, and the resulting component is the implementation of inclusive practice based on the willingness and ability to interact with students with disabilities.

It was found that, to the greatest extent, university teachers have formed a motivational readiness to implement inclusive education, but they experience a deficit of operational skills, when working with students with disabilities. At the same time, the level of psychological readiness to implement an inclusive educational process significantly differs depending on the subject specialisation of teachers and the presence / absence of previous experience of interaction with people with disabilities.

Scientific novelty. The model of the psychological readiness of teachers for the implementation of inclusive education in Russia was developed and empirically confirmed.

Practical significance. The findings of this research highlight the significance of the stages of the formation of university teachers' psychological readiness for inclusive education. The following stages are determined: from providing basic methodological readiness in the framework of professional development through the creation of internal conditions for readiness for inclusive education, examining the experiences and psychological difficulties in interacting with people with disabilities, and, finally, to accompanying the actual inclusive teaching practice.

inclusive higher education, inclusive educational process, psychological readiness, academic teaching staff, university teacher, students with disabilities

1. Valisova A., Svoboda P. Higher-education teacher in the context of his professional competency. Studia Edukacyjne. 2018; 50: 241-255. DOI: 10.14746/se.2018.50.16

2. Kantor V. Z. Inclusive higher education: Special environmental conditions for teaching disabled students. Psihologo-pedagogicheskie issledovanija = Psychological-Educational Studies. 2019; 11 (3): 44-56. DOI: 10.17759/psyedu.2019110304 (In Russ.)

3. Getzel E. E., Thoma C. A. Experiences of college students with disabilities and the importance of self-determination in higher education settings. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals. 2008; 31: 77-84. DOI: 10.1177/0885728808317658

4. Strnadova I., Hajkova V., Kvetonova L. Voices of university students with disabilities: Inclusive education on the tertiary level - a reality or a distant dream? International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2015; 19 (10): 1080-1095.

5. Vickerman Ph., Blundell M. Hearing the voices of disabled students in higher education. Disability & Society. 2010; 25 (1): 21-32. DOI: 10.1080/09687590903363290

6. Yssel N., Pak N., Beilke J. A Door must be opened: Perceptions of students with disabilities in higher education. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. 2016; 63 (3): 384-394. DOI: 10.1080/1034912X.2015.1123232

7. Kalgin Yu. A. Modern approaches to the formation of psychological and pedagogical support for inclusive education of disabled people at the university. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Obrazovanie i pedagogicheskie nauki = Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University. Education and Pedagogical Sciences. 2011; 622: 119132. (In Russ.)

8. Kantor V. Z. Social'no-reabilitacionnoe soprovozhdenie integrirovannogo vuzovskogo obrazovanija lic ogranichennymi vozmozhnostjami zdorov'ja: nauchno-prakticheskie osnovy = Social and rehabilitation support of integrated higher education for persons with disabilities: Scientific and practical foundations. In: S. S. Lebedeva, G. G. Ivanova (eds.). Obrazovanie na protjazhenii vsej zhizni: raznoobrazie idej, koncepcij, form, metodov, tehnologij: Mezhdunarodnaja monografija v 10 tomah: Tom 7. Obuchenie lic so special'nymi potrebnostjami = Education throughout life: A variety of ideas, concepts, forms, methods, technologies. International monograph in 10 volumes. Vol. 7. Education for persons with special needs. St. Petersburg: Polytechnic-service; 2013. p. 94-114. (In Russ.)

9. Efimova G. Z., Volosnikova L. M., Ogorodnova O. V. Gender dimension of inclusion: The case of Western Siberia universities. Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education. 2018; 23 (2): 77-88. (In Russ.)

10. Lukyanova N. A., Shchukina N. I., Fell E. V. Inclusion in the corporate culture of the university: approaches to understanding and directions of change. Vestnik nauki Sibiri = Bulletin of Science of Siberia. 2016; 1 (20): 101-110. (In Russ.)

11. Sorokin N. Yu., Lukovenko T. G. Readiness for training disabled students in academic staff of universities. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education. 2018; 23 (2): 68-76. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2018230208 (In Russ.)

12. Molina V. M., Rodriguez H. P., Aguilar N. M., Fernandez A. C., Morina A. The role of lecturers and inclusive education. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. 2016; 16 (s1): 1046-1049.

13. Ortiz Colon A. M., Agreda Montoro M., Colmenero Ruiz M. J. Toward inclusive higher education in a global context. Sustainability [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Nov 04]; 10 (8): 2670. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2670

14. Kantor V. Z., Antropov A. P., Voilokova E. F., Puzan V. V. Consulting in the field of inclusive university education: The needs of participants in educational relations. Special'noe obrazovanie = Special Education. 2020; 3: 52-62. (In Russ.)

15. Rymkhanova A. R., Tebenova K. S., Museeva G. N., Serikov T. Sh., Bayanov M. A. To the question of the readiness of a university teacher to teach students with special educational needs. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal prikladnyh i fundamental'nyh issledovanij = International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research. 2016; 3-4: 673-676. (In Russ.)

16. Kashlanovn S. N., Kudryavtsev V. A. On some problems and tendencies of development of educational organizations of higher education and the regional resource centers, higher education, training of persons with special needs and disabilities on the results of monitoring. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Minin University [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Aug 13]; 3 (20). Available from: https://vestnik.mininuniver.ru/jour/article/view/635/613 (In Russ.)

17. Margolis A. A., Rubtsov V. V., Serebryannikova O. A. Promoting the quality and accessibility of higher education for people with disabilities in the Russian Federation. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education. 2017; 22 (1): 10-17. (In Russ.)

18. Boyle C., Sharma U. Inclusive education - Worldly views? Support for Learning. 2015; 30: 2-3.

19. Tienda M. Diversity # inclusion: Promoting integration in higher education. Educational Researcher. 2013; 42 (9): 467-475.

20. Waterfield J., West B. Inclusive assessment in higher education: A resource for change [Internet]. Plymouth: University of Plymouth; 2006 [cited 2020 Aug 13]. 288 p. Available from: https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/uploads/production/document/path/3/3026/Space_toolkit.pdf

21. Booth T., Ainscow M., Black-Hawkins K., Vaughan M., Shaw L. Index for inclusion [Internet]. Bristol: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education; 2002 [cited 2020 Aug 24]. 106 p. Available from: http://csie.org.uk/resources/translations/IndexEnglish.pdf

22. Emmers E., Baeyens D., Petry K. Attitudes and self-efficacy of teachers towards inclusion in higher education. European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2020; 35 (2): 139153. DOI: 10.1080/08856257.2019.1628337

23. Akhmetova D. Z. Gotovnost' rossijskih pedagogov realizovyvat' inkljuzivnuju kul'turu i inkljuzivnuju praktiku (koncepcija i real'nost') = Readiness of Russian teachers to implement inclusive culture and inclusive practice (concept and reality). In: Professionalizm pedagoga: sushhnost', soderzhanie, perspektivy razvitija. Chast' 1 = Professionalism of the teacher: Essence, content, development prospects. Part 1. Moscow: International Academy of Sciences of Pedagogical Education; 2016. p. 68-74. (In Russ.)

24. Valitskaya A. P., Rabosh V. A. Inclusive education - education for all. Social'naja pedagogika = Social Pedagogy. 2009; 1: 18-22. (In Russ.)

25. Kantor V. Z. On the preparation of teachers for inclusive education. Vestnik Gercenovskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Herzen University. 2010; 6 (80): 29-31. (In Russ.)

26. Kantor V. Z., Proekt Yu. L. Inclusive higher education: socio-psychological wellbeing of students. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2019; 21 (2): 51-73. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2019-2-51-73 (In Russ.)

27. Dunn C., Rabren K. S., Taylor S. L., Dotson C. K. Assisting students with high-incidence disabilities to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Intervention in School and Clinic. 2012; 48 (1): 47-54. DOI 10.1177/1053451212443151

28. Hong B. S. S. Qualitative analysis of the barriers college students with disabilities experience in higher education. Journal of College Student Development. 2015; 56 (3): 209-226. DOI: 10.1353/csd.2015.0032

29. Lombardi A., Vukovic B., Sala-Bars I. international comparisons of inclusive instruction among college faculty in Spain, Canada, and the United States. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability. 2015; 28 (4): 447-460.

30. Martins H. M., Borges M. L., Goncalves T. Attitudes towards inclusion in higher education in a Portuguese university. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2018; 22 (5): 527-542. DOI:10.1080/13603116.2017.1377299

31. Morina A. Inclusive education in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2017; 32 (1): 3-17. DOI: 10.1080/08856257.2016.1254964

32. Gokool-Baurhoo N., Asghar A. “I can't tell you what the learning difficulty is”: Barriers experienced by college science instructors in teaching and supporting students with learning disabilities. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2019; 79: 17-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2018.11.016

33. Alleman N. F., Holly L. N., Costello C. A. Leveraging a new building to overcome first and second-order barriers to faculty technology integration. Journal of Learning Spaces [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2020 June 11]; 2 (1). Available from: http://www.partnershipsjournal.org/index.php/jls/article/view/381

34. Avramidis E., Norwich B. Teachers' attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2002; 17 (2): 129-147. DOI: 10.1080/08856250210129056

35. Hwang Y.-S., Evans D. Attitudes towards inclusion: Gaps between belief and practice. International Journal of Special Education. 2011; 26 (1): 136-146.

36. Murray C., Lombardi A., Wren C. T. The effects of disability-focused training on the attitudes and perceptions of university staff. Remedial and Special Education. 2011; 32 (4): 290-300. DOI: 10.1177/0741932510362188

37. Tschannen-Moran M., Hoy A. W. Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2001; 17 (7): 783-805. DOI: 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1

38. Ewing D. L., Monsen J. J., Kielblock S. Teachers' attitudes towards inclusive education: A critical review of published questionnaires. Educational Psychology in Practice. 2018; 34 (2): 150-165. DOI: 10.1080/02667363.2017.1417822

39. Danilova O. V. To the question of the psychological readiness of teachers for professional activity in the context of inclusive education. Vestnik Marijskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Mari State University. 2017; 3 (27): 62-67. (In Russ.)

40. Khitryuk V. V. Inkljuzivnaja gotovnost' pedagogov: genezis, fenomenologija, koncepcija formirovanija = Inclusive readiness of teachers: Genesis, phenomenology, concept of formation. Belarus, Baranovichi: Baranovichi State University; 2015. 276 p. (In Russ.)

41. Alekhina S. V., Agafonova E. L., Alekseeva M. N. Preparedness of teachers as the main factor of success of the inclusive process in education. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education. 2011; 16 (1): 83-92. (In Russ.)

42. Afanasiev D. V., Denisova O. A., Lekhanova O. L., Ponikarova V. N. Higher education teacher readiness for inclusive education. Psihologo-pedagogicheskie issledovanija = Psychological-Educational Studies. 2019; 11 (3): 128-142. DOI: 10.17759/psyedu.2019110311 (In Russ.)

43. Kantor V. Z., Antropov A. P., Proekt Yu. L. Academic staff readiness for inclusion in education: The problematic field. Izvestia RGPU im. A. I. Herzen = Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences. 2020; 195: 7-25. (In Russ.)

44. Zhang Y., Rosen S., Cheng L., Li J. Inclusive higher education for students with disabilities in China: What do the university teachers think? Higher Education Studies. 2018; 8 (4): 104-115. DOI: 10.5539/hes.v8n4p104

45. Avramidis E., Bayliss P., Burden R. A Survey into mainstream teachers' attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school in one local education authority. Educational Psychology. 2000; 20 (2): 191-211. DOI: 10.1080/713663717

46. Leyser Y., Kapperman G., Keller R. Teacher attitudes toward mainstreaming: A cross-cultural study in six nations. European Journal of Special Needs Education. 1994; 9 (1): 1-15. DOI: 10.1080/0885625940090101

47. MacMillan M., Tarrant M., Abraham C., Morris C. The association between children's contact with people with disabilities and their attitudes towards disability: A systematic review. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2014; 56 (6): 529-546. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.12326

48. Norman K., Caseau D., Stefanich G. Teaching students with disabilities in inclusive science classrooms: Survey results. Science Education. 1998; 82: 127-146. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199804)82:23.0.CO;2-G

49. Morina A. Faculty members who engage in inclusive pedagogy: Methodological and affective strategies for teaching. Teaching in Higher Education [Internet]. Ahead-Of-Print. 2020 Feb 11 [cited 2020 Oct 28]; 1-16. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13562517.2020.1724938 DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2020.1724938