Transformative agency of students as a resource to form civic consciousness in education system
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2024-4-169-200
Abstract
Introduction. The relevance of the study is associated with the need for the formation of civic consciousness among the young generation. It is important to create mechanisms for involving young people in active creative activity through volunteering and constructive political activity. In the current conditions, it is necessary to restructure the consciousness and correct the behaviour of young people by creating certain conditions for prosocial activity, mutual assistance and support for those who need it especially.
Aim. The aim of the article is to assess the real practices and potential of civic participation of students in the Sverdlovsk region, identifying the sociocultural features of civic consciousness of high school students and students through the prism of their transformative agency and identifying the conditions of the educational environment for the expansion of youth prosocial activity in the interests of territorial development.
Methodology and research methods. The methodological basis of the article is a set of theoretical ideas about the transforming agency of youth and the formation of socially responsible behaviour of young Russians as citizens of their country, region, and city of residence. The theory of civic consciousness has received a certain development in the article. The present article is based on the materials of the authors’ research project implemented in 2022 in the Sverdlovsk region. The authors analysed the data of a mass survey of young people in the Sverdlovsk region from 14 to 24 years old from 79 settlements of the region, carried out by the questionnaire method. 996 people were interviewed, the sample is representative, the error is no more than 3,5%. There are four quotas in its base: gender, age, main type of education (school, secondary school, university); type of city by population. The data of the quantitative survey are supplemented by the results of the analysis of social youth projects that received government support at the regional level in the subsidy competition of the Ministry of Education and Youth Policy of the Sverdlovsk Region in 2022–2023.
Results and scientific novelty. The study demonstrated that the educational environment is designed and creates conditions for the acquisition of civic experience by young students today. On the one hand, projects, actions, information events should be called for the formation of civic consciousness in the development of transformative agency of youth. On the other hand, they should give young people the opportunity to realise and develop their transformative agency as citizens of their country, residents of their city through reflection, initiative, plans aimed at solving urgent social problems, and their implementation. Systematic work to create conditions for this in educational institutions should help complement the organisation of passive civic participation with mechanisms that help young Russians realise their active civic position, stimulate them to take real actions in the socio-political sphere. The study proves that civic experience and civic subjectivity, which manifests itself in various practices of civic participation, accumulates and is formed among young people depending on age. This is less expressed in high school students, and more expressed in university students. University students are more subjective; they do not just formally use resources for civic engagement, but try to accumulate civic knowledge with their help, consciously showing interest and intention in the sphere of such activity. The conditions of the environment of civic participation in the education system largely determine the differences in the subjective value characteristics of high school students and university students, revealing the transformative agency in the development of their civic consciousness.
Practical significance. Considering the geopolitical challenges in Russian education today, the issue of implementing educational work with young people is acute. Given the special characteristics of the civic activity of Russian youth for the organisation of social work with high school students and university students, it is important to understand the potential of civic activity of the young generation, especially those characteristics possessed by the socially active part of schoolchildren and students for correcting the course of regional youth policy and improving the mechanisms of government support for youth projects in the education system.
Keywords
About the Authors
M. V. PevnayaRussian Federation
Maria V. Pevnaya – Dr. Sci. (Sociology), Associate Professor, Head of the Sociology and Public Administration Technologies Department,
Ekaterinburg.
A. N. Tarasova
Russian Federation
Anna N.Tarasova –Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Associate Professor, Sociology and Public Administration Technologies Department,
Ekaterinburg.
D. F. Telepaeva
Russian Federation
Daria F. Telepaeva – Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Associate Professor, Sociology and Public Administration Technologies Department,
Ekaterinburg.
D. S. Protasov
Russian Federation
Denis S. Protasov – Director, Department of Youth Policy,
Ekaterinburg.
References
1. Sorokin P. S., Zykova A. V. “Transforming agency” as a subject of research and development in the 21st century: Review and interpretation of international experience. Monitoring obshhestvennogo mnenija: jekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny = Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2021; 5: 216–241. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.5.1858 (In Russ.)
2. Sorokin P. S., Frumin I. D. The “structure/action” problem in the 21st century: Changes in social reality and conclusions for the research agenda. Sociologicheskie issledovanija = Sociological Research. 2020; 7: 27–36. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009571-1 (In Russ.)
3. Ledeneva A. V. Sovremennaja social’naja teorija: Burd’e, Giddens, Habermas = Modern social theory: Bourdieu, Giddens, Habermas. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University; 1995. 120 p. (In Russ.)
4. Alekseeva T. A. Agent-structural relations: Methodology of constructivism. Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija = Polis. Political Studies. 2022; 4: 77–93. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.04.07 (In Russ.)
5. McAdams D. P. Narrative identity: What is it? What does it do? How do you measure it? Imagination, Cognition and Personality. 2018; 37 (3): 359–372. DOI: 10.1177/0276236618756704
6. Harichev A. D., Shutov A. Ju., Polosin A. V. Perception of basic values, factors and structures of the socio-historical development of Russia. Zhurnal politicheskih issledovanij = Journal of Political Research. 2022; 3 (6): 9–19. DOI: 10.12737/2587-6295-2022-6-3-9-19 (In Russ.)
7. Bishop J. Natural agency: An essay on the causal theory of action. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1989. 224 p.
8. Aksenova O. V. Subject of social action in modern development of Russia: Agent, actor, no one. Vestnik Instituta sociologii = Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology. 2020; 2 (11): 37–53. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2020.11.2.640 (In Russ.)
9. Nedjak I. L. Citizenship in the perception and attitudes of Russians as a factor of societal (dis) integration. Vlast’ = Power. 2022; 5 (30): 111–117. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v30i5.9246 (In Russ.)
10. Petuhov V. V. Civil participation in modern Russia: interaction of political and social practices. Sociologicheskie issledovanija = Sociological Studies. 2019; 12: 3–14. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250007743-0 (In Russ.)
11. Igalla M., Edelenbos J., Van Meerkerk I. Citizens in action, what do they accomplish? A systematic literature review of citizen initiatives, their main characteristics, outcomes, and factors. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 2019; 30: 1176–1194. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-019-00129-0
12. Nartova N. A. Citizenship in the view of St. Petersburg youth and their parents. Sociologicheskie issledovanija = Sociological Studies. 2019; 12: 38–47. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250007742-9 (In Russ.)
13. Rozhkova L. V., Vasileva N. D. Citizenship and patriotism as the basis for the social consolidation of Russian society. Monitoring obshhestvennogo mnenija: jekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny = Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2014; 3 (121): 123–129. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2014.3.08 (In Russ.)
14. Majboroda A., Sablina A., Jasaveev I. State for youth or youth for the state: Discourses of youth policy in the countries of the European Union and Russia. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie = Sociological Review. 2021; 3 (20): 71–97. DOI: 10.17323/1728-192x-2021-3-71-97 (In Russ.)
15. Lubskij A. V., Mamina D. A. Citizenship among youth as a subject of theoretical and methodological discourse. Social’no-gumanitarnye znanija = Social and Humanitarian Knowledge [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Oct 14]; 7: 69–78. Available from: https://www.fnisc.ru/publ.html?id=7601&type=publ (In Russ.)
16. Sedova N. N. Civil activism in modern Russia: Formats, factors, social base. Sociologicheskij zhurnal = Sociological Journal. 2014; 2: 48–71. DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2014.2.495 (In Russ.)
17. Surkova I. Ju., Shheblanova V. V., Loginova L. V. Civic activism of youth of the Saratov region: socio-political inclusion and participation potential. Sociologicheskie issledovanija = Sociological Research. 2020; 8: 90–100. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009485-6 (In Russ.)
18. Obuhova Ju. O., Safonova A. S., Arkannikova M. S. The process of assimilation of political values and the dynamics of the development of the institution of civil participation in the youth environment. Kommunikologija = Communicology. 2020; 3 (8): 95–108. DOI: 10.21453/2311-3065-2020-8-3-95-108 (In Russ.)
19. Uhanova Ju. V., Leon D., Shelvald R. Charitable activities of the local community: Results of sociological research in the Russian region. Jekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz = Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2021; 1 (14): 169–185. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.1.73.12 (In Russ.)
20. Weiss J. What is youth political participation? Literature review on youth political participation and political attitudes. Frontiers in Political Science. 2020; 2. DOI: 10.3389/fpos.2020.00001
21. Kitanova M. Youth political participation in the EU: Evidence from a cross-national analysis. Journal of Youth Studies. 2020; 7 (23): 819–836. DOI: 10.1080/13676261.2019.1636951
22. Simonofski A., Vallé T., Serral E. Investigating context factors in citizen participation strategies: A comparative analysis of Swedish and Belgian smart cities. International Journal of Information Management. 2021; 56. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.09.007
23. Silke C., Brady B., Dolan P. Social values and civic behaviour among youth in Ireland: The influence of social contexts. Irish Journal of Sociology. 2020; 28: 44–64. DOI: 10.1177/0791603519863295
24. Riniolo V., Ortensi L. Young generations’ activism in Italy: Comparing political engagement and participation of native youths and youths from a migrant background. Social Indicators Research. 2021; 3 (153): 923–955. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-020-02487-5
25. Vavilina N. D., Parshukova G. B., Romannikov O. D. Civil society as a subject of social influence (on the example of the Novosibirsk region). Sociologicheskie issledovanija = Sociological Research. 2021; 1: 63–74. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250011313-7 (In Russ.)
26. Murzina I. Ja., Kazakova S. V. Promising directions of patriotic education. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2019; 2 (21): 155–175. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2019-2-155-175 (In Russ.)
27. Shherbakova L. I., Filonenko V. I. Active patriotism as a factor in the creative development of Russian youth in a changing social reality: contradictions of formation. Vlast’ = Power. 2019; 1: 112–119. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v27i1.6237 (In Russ.)
28. Malenkov V. V. Patriotism, citizenship in politics and youth identity. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofija. Sociologija. Politologija =Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political Science [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Oct 14]; 67: 120–131. Available from: https://vital.lib.tsu.ru/vital/access/manager/Repository/koha:000898986 (In Russ.)
29. Selezneva A. V., Azarnova A. A. “The birth of a citizen”: A political and psychological analysis of the citizenship of Russian high school students. Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija = Polis. Political Studies. 2020; 5: 101–113. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.05.08 (In Russ.)
30. Vereshhagina A. V., Zajceva A. A. Factors of social behavior of university students in the Rostov region in the civil sphere. Gosudarstvennoe i municipal’noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski = State and Municipal Management. Scientific Notes [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Oct 14]; 3: 233–240. Available from: http://upravlenie.uriu.ranepa.ru/index.php/upravlenie/article/view/1426 (In Russ.)
31. Brodovskaja E. V., Dombrovskaja A. Ju., Pyrma R. V. Readiness of modern Russian youth to implement civil and political activity in the digital environment. Vlast’ = Power. 2019; 27 (1): 91–95. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v27i1.6233 (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Pevnaya M.V., Tarasova A.N., Telepaeva D.F., Protasov D.S. Transformative agency of students as a resource to form civic consciousness in education system. The Education and science journal. 2024;26(4):169-200. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2024-4-169-200